It was quite predictable that the news about the murder of Oliver Ivanovic in the Serbian state leadership would cause a terrible uproar, a serious rampage and the resulting series of exculpatory, semi-hysterical statements and reckless moves...
... but if we put our hand on our heart, if we just think a little, we will quickly conclude that even though it was a shock, the murder of Oliver Ivanovic was not as much of a bolt from the blue as it was presented by the state-building media and on-duty conspiracy theorists.
Because, watch out. Months ago - practically since he got out of prison and started to lead a policy of compromise and reconciliation - Oliver Ivanovic was exposed to an uninterrupted series of spitting, threats, pressure, various harassments, burning of cars, and from the "security community" - international, not ours - to Ivanovic occasionally received discreet warnings that they would spend longer in prison than in freedom.
As things are already going in Serbia - the deceased, who was considered a traitor by the regime and their branch in Kosovo until yesterday - overnight acquired the halo of a martyr for the national cause, he has not yet cooled down, and there have been proposals to repay Ivanović's grateful fatherhood by appointing a street, where Aco the Serb (or was it the famous grandson, Đurić) "assessed" that "a shot at Ivanović is a shot at all Serbs". Do we need to say that, if not all of them, but a good number of Serbs, felt shot.
Immediately afterwards, Aco Srbin sharply denied the insinuations of the Serbian opposition that Ivanović's murder was political, failing to explain to the people and the senate as a lawyer (with an average score of ten) that how is it possible that the murder of a politician on the doorstep of his political organization can be qualified as someone else, a crime of passion, for example, manslaughter or manslaughter. I would still (partially) agree with Aca's statement, because this is a parapolitical murder with elements of negligence, not, however, Ivanović's, but the negligence of the competent Serbian services - you know the ones I mean - who must have known what was going on behind the hill , and they didn't even think of assigning security to Ivanovic.
How a country functions is best seen in so-called crisis situations (a parapolitical murder is one of those) in which one must remain calm, and the commotion that arose in the Serbian state leadership after the assassination in North Mitrovica was only slightly smaller than that during the great flood from In 2014, this is how things went, the Serbian delegation was promptly withdrawn from the non-started Serbo-Albanian negotiations in Brussels and thus gave the Albanian side an argument for the logically plausible, though most probably not correct, claim that Ivanovic's murder was Belgrade's fat, designed with the aim of undermining the negotiations. Aco Serbin, in truth, left open the possibility that Ivanovic - like many other Serbs, of all times and colors - died at the hands of a Serb, but immediately "removed" the matter by asserting that the killer, even if he was a Serb, was in fact not a Serb. ., whispering again to clarify - and yes, who is Red Ban then?
(danas.rs)
Bonus video:
