When was the last time we were hit in the head? Most of us experienced this in elementary or high school. A negligible number of us maybe got into a fist fight in a bar, at a stadium or during a traffic dispute.
But what if a disease appears that makes the patient want to hit other people in the head? At the same time, the pain could also have as a side effect that the patient wants to inflict a blow on himself, sometimes seriously injuring himself. A small percentage of those suffering from this disease could even die. Every hundredth, let's say, would be killed by his own or someone else's blows.
Let's complicate this a bit. The disease is contagious and spreads. When one person hits another, the hit person gets the urge to hit himself and two other people on the head. Layman's math says that in this way, after the first infected person, a mass fight of all genders and ages will be developed, in which 3 million people will be hit in the head within a few weeks, and 30.000 of them will die. And the numbers will continue to grow...
Finally, let's imagine that scientists invented a vaccine, after receiving which at least 7 out of 10 people will not feel the stated desire to hit, if they come into contact with the disease. The mass brawl is diminishing. And if more than 70% of them are vaccinated, there is a possibility that the fighting will stop.
Fortunately for us, this imaginary fight does not exist. There is only Kovid.
* * *
The problems with covid-19 are these two: the type of disease and the type of vaccine. If, for example, it were an epidemic that we mentioned in the above example, in addition to the health care system, the security system would also break. Therefore, it can be assumed that this vaccination - the cause of mass fights, murders and suicides - would be far more desirable than the one that helps us not to get sick and die from insignificant pneumonia.
This is not the only example of what a fancied Corona could be. Here, one could also imagine that covid-19 (the number is symbolic) causes - impotence. It is quite certain that taking some kind of pre-protection would be far more popular and desirable than the current process of vaccination against a disease that attacks the wrong, sorry, organ. And it's not that Pfizer, by the way.
Well, yes. In addition to the wrong disease, the vaccine was packaged incorrectly. It's in a damn injection that hurts "horribly". But if, say, it were a tablet, it would be easier. Or that the vaccine can be drunk from a glass, bottle, grandchild; that it can be smoked (possibly even from some kind of fancy apparatus) or its whitish "wax" powder can be snorted. In all these cases, there would certainly not be so many mass protests, opinions on the networks or YouTube sermons. Because they are not there even now - and they are snorting, smoking and drinking everywhere.
* * *
The collective consciousness of the population, therefore, would not require an imposed - and even easy to perform - obligation to protect against the excess of promiscuity and the lack of sex. I would like that... However, given that the Corona pandemic is a disease that, in the opinion of the current collective consciousness, is not that problematic, then the introduction of mandatory vaccination is still being considered. The mathematical "paradox" of the epidemic is, namely, that not only those who ignore it suffer, but everyone. And the paradox increases especially where collective epidemiological protection is on the same level as everything else collective: property, equality, justice, security, education, empathy - anything but collective madness and hysteria. In this environment of ours, therefore. And there is no collective vaccine for any of the above, nor is there a clear answer to the question of whether it would be "received". Because we are late.
And in the case of Corona, maybe we haven't yet.
We will find out very soon.
Bonus video:
