Dijete Fićko, the main architect from Podgorica - does not let his word be spoken in Vijesti on issues that fall within his scope - without hanging up.
After the text entitled "He is not an expert to comment on someone's expertise" (Vijesti, print edition, October 15, 2020) coincided with the allegations made by Mr. Darko Vlahović (Director of CREAM Montenegro PPP Alliance/ Public Private Partnership Association) in the text entitled "Construction eastern stands of the Podgorica city stadium: They ignored the road map, drew their own" (Vijesti portal, October 13, 2020) - Dijete Fićko in the article entitled "Aleksić: Rakčević tries to manipulate the public when it comes to the protection of Gorica" (Vijesti portal, 26 . October) promptly matched the claims of Luka Rakčević, a member of the URA in the Assembly of PG, presented in an attachment about the construction of a building on the hill of Gorica, which was broadcast on TV Vijesti the day before (Vijesti portal, "Vuković did not protect Gorica and examined the documents: The building is being built with eight apartments, DUP expired in 2016", October 25, 2020).
"After the more than successfully completed competition for the conceptual architectural solution of the eastern tribune of the City Stadium in Podgorica, we are pleased to be able to announce," writes child Fićko in a text published on October 15, "that all three awards have been awarded (come on!? - all three prizes were awarded!? - is that possible!? - op.a.), as well as one redemption (mašala, mašala - op.a.)".
It is, of course, about the more than pointless and more than controversial Competition for the conceptual architectural solution of the eastern tribune of the city stadium in Podgorica, which was announced by Dijete Fićko, that is, the capital city of Podgorica, on June 26 of the current year. That competition was preceded by the more than pointless, more than unsuccessful and more than controversial Competition for the conceptual architectural solution of the eastern tribune of the city stadium in Podgorica, which was announced by Dijete Fićko, i.e. the capital city of Podgorica, on December 20 last year.
The results of the first nonsensical competition were announced on March 31 of this year. In the Report on received works, it was stated that three works were received - yes, yes, only three works were received - it is not a mistake. I tried to download the call for tenders from the GGPG website (podgorica.me) and find out whether the call for tenders required a minimum number of works for the competition to be considered regular - but I did not succeed - I assume that the reason is the transition to the new GGPG website - which was launched on July 8 this year.
The Jury Decision states that the (seven-member) Jury "unanimously concluded" that not one (only) of the three competition works "did not reach the (famous - op.a.) quality of the first prize, so it decided (unanimously? - probably unanimously - op .a.) that the same is not assigned". Second prize was awarded and two redemptions were awarded. In the conclusion of the Report on the opening of the envelope marked "Author Information", it is stated that one of the members of the Jury - Dragan Komatina (known as Komi) - stated that one of the three authors behind the second prize-winning work is employed by the Company for Production, Trade and Services export-import "Studio K" doo from Podgorica - behind which he - Komi - stands as the founder and one of the two authorized representatives.
Anyway, on June 26 of the current year, as I said, the second/new nonsensical Competition for the conceptual architectural solution of the eastern tribune of the city stadium in Podgorica was announced - which, as Dijete Fićko said, was "more than successfully" completed. In the news that appeared on podgorica.me regarding the announcement of a new tender, it is stated that "the tender was re-announced because in the first call solutions were submitted that did not meet the criteria defined by the tender" - all with the aim of obtaining "a high-quality architectural solution for the new the eastern stands of the City Stadium with accompanying facilities, in all respects according to valid UEFA and FIFA standards".
Again, I have to state that I didn't manage to download the Call for Tenders for the conceptual architectural solution of the eastern tribune of the city stadium in Podgorica from podgorica.me - but that's why I downloaded the Jury's Decision. This time there was no honorable and honest Komi in the composition of the seven-member Jury - Slavica Stamatović Vučković - Komi's colleague from the Faculty of Architecture - took his place, which is the only change compared to the composition of the Jury that decided on the awards at the first competition. Comey's absence from the Jury, it will turn out, opened a wide path for Comey's team straight to competition laurels.
On the podgorica.me address, I dug up - randomly - one Conceptual architectural solution behind Studio K doo - that is, Slavica Komatina, dia, in the role of the responsible person - and at the same time the executive director and authorized person in front of the business entity Studio K doo from Podgorica. The names of nine collaborators on the above-mentioned conceptual solution are also listed - and six of those names appear in the teams behind the works that are the Jury of the second Competition for the conceptual architectural solution of the eastern tribune of the city stadium in Podgorica (the results of the competition were announced on October 2). crowned with awards - one name is in the first-prized team, four names are in the second-prized team (the complete team behind the second-prized work), and one more name appears, along with the mentioned Mrs. Komatina, in the third-prized team. Of the three female authors who were behind the second-prized work in the first competition - two took part in this competition as well - one was a member of the second-prized team, and the other of the third-prized team.
Therefore, the rumors circulating in the dark architectural corridors in recent weeks that Komi was on the Jury of the second competition are incorrect - but it is true that his close and dear associates did well in the competition - which means that Fić's "afterwards and more than successfully of the completed competition" most likely refers to Komi's team. Komi, in short, pulled off Fić's nonsensical competition. If it weren't for Komi... etc.
And as for the works - I find neither the will nor the strength to face them - because I am deeply convinced that the contests directed by Djetet Fićko are below all standards - even Montenegrin and Podgorica standards - which, frankly, have never been weren't even tall - but that's a difficult story that doesn't interest the so-called profession at this time.
"As the chief city architect and president of the Association of Architects of Montenegro", writes Dijete Fićko in a text published on October 15, "I believed that Montenegro absolutely has the quality and knowledge to sign this project (the eastern stands of the City Stadium - op.a.) local scene, which turned out to be the right decision”.
If Studio K had not been involved - and at almost full capacity - other songs would have been sung by our dear Child today.
"In this way, multiple benefits were obtained", continues Dijete Fićko, "where colleagues were given the opportunity to show their talent, as well as monetary rewards that remained in Montenegro".
About the protection of Gorica in the next issue, or in one of the following issues.
Bonus video:
