Now is the right time to remember the words Thomas Mann: "The specter stumbles on the edge of mockery." Hardly anything can bring us closer to the horror in which the world has plunged. Global capitalism is the cause that generates disastrous consequences, if we don't want to, we refuse to see it, our vision will be scattered and register the reality of the eclipsed consequences, whether it is children being born in the hell of the Gaza Strip, or the melting of the ice pole, or the extinction of species. .. So: in the twilight of the world, it is an ethical duty to think soberly, even in Hades to question things, as he says Sokrat.
The situation is as follows: daily news of the massacre comes from Gaza, we also have the assassination of Donald Trump, Marine Le Pen after the election promised to come to power in the next one (maybe even before), artificial intelligence is on an unstoppable rise - whether it's dominance on the war fronts, space exploration, brain implantation, up to the complete digital dematerialization of reality. There is a very rough side of power (an extremely dominant form of extracting profit from everything), and a slightly more subtle, virtual, cybernetic and operational side: working over the Internet networks a cyber-dealer from China, no less - a cyber-terrorist who attacks state institutions with fake emails, so the reality is the flow system through which the rocket that follows the given command or the fentanyl that destroys addicts across the US, ordered via the deep net, 'passes'.
No matter how you look at things, it is clear that modernity is completely dehumanized, and it is paradoxical that the cause of this is the 'excess of communication' which, as we can see, is completely controlled: there are not two blocks, but one medal with two sides. , as long ago only capitalism has an exit/passage. His ideology is false, but the emotional investments we incorporate into it in every discussion are real. So we are always drawn in, there is no distance or respite, as the order is - enjoy, so it is - act. And yet, how to move from insight to action remains a persistent unanswered question.
The rest, that is to say the whole world thanks to the work of global capitalism remains stuck in growing disorder, chaos, political, economic, religious; we are constantly in debates, flooded with information, which is a clear sign that we are reduced to commentators, and/or: an audience that has the right to vote while it has no influence on anything.
So what did the elections in France show us? There is something big at stake... Namely, the creation of a united, widely different bloc is possible only when those in power have no chance of taking absolute power. Ok, what can explain that to a modern citizen? That, really, it is just as possible for us to join together, as above all political beings, against what politics itself offers, and it is always division, as what should enable us - building an identity, an attitude, a voice. If the government has an interest, so do we, who not only need to control the government as our service, but always show that we are an employer who chose a political service based on competence and expertise, etc.
is not Asanzhova it's his fault (it can't be) that there are no "whistleblowers" and global "whistleblowers", he showed us how things work where they are created, how much real power corporations and private capital have, and how far politics goes in serving and protecting the interests of the official powerful . The fact that we, on the other hand, have chosen to act civilly by - limiting our rights to control where plastic, paper waste is disposed of, how to act in public space, how to protect endangered species (and in addition, bees are disappearing, without which the world is not possible ), is our problem, because we have maximally suppressed the field of concrete action due to the protection of personal interest. A liberal conservative should by no means be complacent towards breaking liberalism into hundreds of false movements that are given full space in these times of crisis, because now the policy of the greens is more important than the policy that will use the trust of the citizens for the purposes of calming all the passions inflamed on all sides.
One of the main, leading problems, from which the others arise in a chain, is certainly in the following: why does liberal-democracy stand on the side of the constant profit of capitalism, unavoidably proclaiming universal values to which it lends the voice with which they are presented?
When we look at things a bit more reserved, let's ask ourselves: is the bigger problem the assassination of Trump, or what H. Kamala certainly won't go in instead Biden in the race for America's leader? (This refers to the problem in which America itself finds itself today, which is very much reflected in the rest of the world.)
Since these things are taking place in the 'cradle of democracy' (which is put to sleep by capitalism), then what can we expect to happen in Sudan, or other countries, North Africa, or in those that are completely swallowed up in a totalitarian system by a more than repressive (monstrous ) authorities.
It's extremely troubling so obvious - the collective neutrality of all of us who constantly abdicate responsibility by practicing the 'philosophy' that things will somehow work themselves out. When it comes to climate change, dying animal species, a geopolitical situation that is on the verge of escalating into an explosion that would mean the end, in the literal sense, our concrete and persistent reactions are persistently absent. Only then, when we are mobilized by the blackmail policy, as in the case of France (either the French will choose against 'neo-fascism', against the policy of regressing to the point of disappearance, or they will not, which is then by no means a choice), the citizens begin to flow into a broadly modeled alliance from different political options that guarantee victory. Yes, but not ours! (How, for example, do the Germans themselves view the deployment of 'conventional missiles' in their country, which opened the story of the 'Cold War'? Will they do anything about it, they have the example set by the farmers, by moved to defend their work and income, or will they continue to ignore the terrifying situation?)
Let's take a look and ask ourselves for a moment: which country is not in a deep crisis today? America, the EU leading countries, Russia, which is at war, Israel, which is showing its darkest side... What can it lead to, and can this bloody carnival of capital be stopped anyway?
However, it is simply unreal how much strategy is being applied in order to - maintain - this disorder and disaster, and no less a tactic is being developed in which megastars are placed in the media machinery from where they call on citizens to act against what is an impending threat, from Mbappe do Taylor Swift, who almost became par excellence political activists of the modern era.
Since i George Clooney flinched and wrote a humorously sharp column for the New York Times (advising Biden to drop out of the race), we're just waiting for the analysis of one Justin Bieber, and the condemnation of the assassination of Trump. Until then, do not, like the author of this text, search the portals because you may come across the following, highly conscious polemic between a woman and a man, in which the other sex advocates that everything natural should be favored and supported because nature has its reasons, while men respond to everything as in that case she should by no means shave her legs or pull out her eyelashes.
Bonus video:
