13:23 The search was terminated. The next hearing is tomorrow at 9 am.
12:44 A document from the United States Department of Justice is being read.
The prosecution states that the data from Western Union shows that the sender is Šišmakov and that he has another passport, and that the money was withdrawn by Saša Sinđelić in Serbia. Prosecutor Čađenović said that this is evidence of a direct connection between Šišmakov and Sinđelić.
The defense indicates that the American authorities emphasized that the information is intended only for "intelligence work" and cannot be used in legal proceedings.
12:32 The response of the Prosecutor's Office of Slovakia to the SDT request is read.
The stay of Širokov and Šišmakov was not recorded on the territory of Slovakia.
12:25 The response of the Federal Public Service for Justice of Belgium dated February 9, 2017 is read.
It is stated that Shirokov and Popov are unknown in the Belgian population registers.
"The question arises as to why Belgium provided information about this visa, but Poland did not," said lawyer Radosavljević.
12:20 Read the response of the Polish Prosecutor's Office to the SDT's request regarding the request for legal assistance in connection with the investigation conducted by the special prosecutor against Širokov Eduard et al.
"Eduard Vladimirovich Shirokov, who is legitimized by a Russian passport issued on August 12.8.2016, 6.6.2012, and Popov, a Russian citizen who is legitimized by a Russian passport issued on June 14, 2012, did not cross the border of Poland. However, it follows from the data of the National Security Agency of the Republic of Poland that Eduard Shirokov could serve in Poland according to the data of Eduard Vladimirovich Shishmakov. That person crossed the border of Poland on December 18, 2014, and left the territory of Poland on October 120004915, 24. In Poland, that person was performing a diplomatic mission as a deputy military attache of the Russian Federation serving with diplomatic passport number 9 issued on September 2012, 24, valid until September 9, 2017," states the response of the Polish Prosecutor's Office.
"The warrant was issued for Eduard Vladimirovich Shirokov, i.e. that is the person against whom the warrant was issued, and in the petition it is stated that this person could have used the name Eduard Šišmakov. These photocopies cannot be valid evidence, because they cannot be verified. The question arises why is the warrant with the name Širokov still in force," said lawyer Radosavljević.
"I object to this evidence in its entirety because it is evidence that has not been certified," said lawyer Bulatović.
11:56 The decision of the Parliament of Montenegro on approval for the initiation of criminal proceedings and the determination of detention against Milan Knežević is being read.
"This decision is very important, because it indicates the political dimension of this procedure," said lawyer Radsavljević.
11:52 The decision of the Parliament of Montenegro on approval for the initiation of criminal proceedings and the determination of custody against Andrija Mandić is being read.
"My client informed the Special Prosecutor's Office that this decision was not made in accordance with the rules of procedure of the Parliament of Montenegro," said lawyer Nikola Medojević.
11:48 The trial continued. The response of the prosecution for organized crime of the Republic of Serbia is being read.
11:10 A break was given until 11:40.
11:05 The confirmation of Sinđelić's temporarily confiscated items is being read
10:58 The report on the search of Saša Sinđelić's computer, phone and other electronic devices is read
Attorney Radosavljević notices that a Nokia phone and a tablet device are missing.
10:50 The official travel order of Mihail Čađenović, issued by the New Serbian Democracy, is being read.
10:34 The letter of the Parliament of Montenegro on the use of the Renault Fluence PG CG 870 vehicle is being read.
"I don't see any significance for this proceeding in the implementation of this evidence," said lawyer Dražen Medojević.
10:28 The letter of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Serbia, Border Police Directorate dated April 27.4 is read. 2018. Response to the letter of the High Court. An answer was requested as to whether Sinđelić crossed the Serbian border in 2016.
"I notice that Sinđelić left for Moscow on September 26.9, 2016 at 23:34 p.m., and that he returned on September 27.9.2016, 23 at 30:XNUMX p.m.," said prosecutor Čađenović.
10.15 A letter from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Border Police Sector of Montenegro for Saša Sinđelić is being read.
"The introduction of this letter is completely different from the one we read a little while ago. I can notice that it is not possible to determine how this person entered Montenegro," said lawyer Jovanović.
9:48 The records of Andrija Mandić's state border crossings are being read
Prosecutor Čađenović said that in 2016, Mandic went to Moscow and Belgrade several times.
Čađenović said that Mandić traveled to Moscow with Anani Nikić in most cases.
Lawyer Jovanović said that "this document was created as a result of breaking the law"
9:32 The records of Milan Knežević's state border crossings are being read.
"I notice that during 2014 and 2015 he left for Russia only once, and in 2016 several departures for Moscow were recorded, starting in February 2016, and that the intensive departure was at the end of June and in the first half of July 2016. I notice that certain departures coincide with the date of Anani Nikić's departure," prosecutor Čađenović said.
"I point out that this document is different from the one we looked at before. It is not in dispute that my client was in Moscow four times, in Belgrade 14 times and once in Rome. Why were extracts for 2014 and 2015 obtained. In this record there are empty columns," said lawyer Radosavljević.
9:23 The record of Anani Nikić's crossings of the state border of Montenegro is being read.
More departures for Moscow were also registered.
"He often crossed the state border. I notice a large number of entries and exits in the period covered by the indictment, both to Belgrade and to Moscow. I also notice a joint trip with Andrija Mandić to Vienna and a trip to Moscow in the seventh month of 2016," he said. prosecutor Saša Čađenović.
Lawyer Jovanović said that the Special State Prosecutor does not have the authority to independently access the database. He proposes to separate this evidence from the case file.
9:20 The records of Mihail Čađenović crossing the state border are being read.
9:17 Mihailo Čađenović said that he does not know what this evidence has to do with the indictment.
Lawyer Jovanović's proposal to exclude this evidence from the case file was rejected as unfounded.
9:05 The record of state border crossings for the Renault Fluence PG CG 870 vehicle is being read.
On March 2016, 2016, Ananije Nikić and Mihailo Čađenović crossed the border by vehicle, and returned on March XNUMX, XNUMX.
"I notice that in this record there is no header of the authority that issued this. I also point to page 3, the time when this document was listed," said lawyer Jovanović.
"I object to this evidence because at the time it was produced, my client did not have any capacity. I suggest separating this evidence from the case file, but I would like the Council to decide on this proposal after hearing expert witness Boljević," Jovanović added.
Lawyer Dražen Medojević said that this evidence has nothing to do with the criminal liability of Čađenović.
At nine o'clock in the Podgorica High Court, the trial of those accused of attempted terrorism on the day of the parliamentary elections continued.
Russian citizens Eduard Šišmakov and Vladimir Popov, who are being tried in absentia, as well as Serbian citizens Nemanja Ristić and Predrag Bogićević, are charged before the panel of judge Suzana Mugoša for the criminal offense of attempted terrorism on the day of the parliamentary elections.
Bratislav Dikić, Democratic Front leaders Milan Knežević and Andrija Mandić and Mandić's driver Mihailo Čađenović are on the dock.
The indictment includes Serbian citizens Kristina Hristić and Branka Milić, who are defending themselves from freedom, as well as their compatriots - Srboljub Đorđević, Dragan Maksić, Milan Dušić who are in custody.
The proceedings were split against DF translator Anani Nikić.
Bonus video:
