The course of the trial
13:17 The trial continues on Friday at 9 am.
13:15 Defendant Milić claims that the equipment was not prepared for her.
The defendant Čađenović said that the drone was "an ordinary toy with which a coup cannot be carried out."
"I am asking the prosecutor not to rush through this procedure..." said Čađenović.
The court warned the bruised Čađenović not to address the prosecutor personally.
13:10 "The question arises why the Special Prosecutor's Office of Montenegro did not ask for money earlier from the Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime of Serbia and the BIA, when the equipment was also delivered, but when the court sent a letter to Serbia," said lawyer Radosavljević.
12:50 The court adjourns for 10 minutes.
12:38 Attorney Krpović believes that the equipment is inadequate and that it was planted by the prosecution.
12:22 Lawyer Anđelić said that the displayed equipment was gathered from "string and rope".
12:14 Attorney Jovović said that the cases have no evidentiary value.
12:02 Prosecutor Čađenović stated that the collection of all items, which were viewed yesterday and today, is unique, and that it is equipment of a military and police character.
11:45 "I suggest, for the sake of the whole of this evidence, because of everything we looked at yesterday and today, that the confirmation of the handover of the case, the official note of the citizen Saša Sinđelić, be used in the evidentiary proceedings, because that way it can be determined what the purpose of everything we looked at was, and not as the prosecutor told us. The record was made on October 26, 2016," said lawyer Radosavljević.
11:42 Prosecutor Čađenović said that the defense takes the time of the recording for granted.
"The question arises as to whether this is the actual time of recording or the time of burning the CD," said Čađenović.
11:37 Lawyer Jovanović said that the act of recording "does not correspond with the report".
"The crime technician won't state what he can't see and builds a fence around some things. He separates things, the four were found in an improvised warehouse, the rest are not. That crime technician feels the need to fence himself off and I thank him for that. This is all that was recorded it was made in two rooms, an hour and a half later. Also, if the official action is carried out in the premises of another body, where there is any trace of the presence of an authorized representative of that institution. For God's sake, an investigation is carried out in the BIA. There is no information from the BIA nothing here. They recorded what they found, picked up and left. This man did not want to endanger his freedom by falsifying the report. This man who is recording knows very well that what they were told to do is not usual," said Jovanovic.
11:30 Radosavljević said that the video was created after the forensic report from the scene was completed.
"This is undoubted proof that the cooperating witness lied to the court," said Radosavljević.
11:28 It was announced that there is information that the recording was made on October 26, 2016 at 4.32:XNUMX a.m.
11:24 Lawyer Radosavljević said that the recording "supports the defense".
"It is unusual that the video has no sound, because we see a man talking. The assumption is that the people who recorded it commented on something. I don't know on what basis the Prosecutor concludes that this is in the premises of the police. The report says that the equipment was found in improvised warehouse. We also see only part of the electronic devices, not all and we see the money. When we look at these things, we see that they contradict the testimony of the cooperating witness. In the end, it is said that all the items were photographed and videotaped. I don't know if it is complete video material and it would be useful to find out when this video recording was made. This recording is in direct contradiction to what the associate witness has been telling us for months," said Radosavljević.
11:17 Prosecutor Čađenović said that the video clearly shows that the items were in the MUP of Serbia and that they were taken from Saša Sinđelić.
"In addition to the items that were inspected, the presence of money was also noted," said Čađenović.
11:15 The report was read and a video was viewed from the inspection of the site, October 25, 2016 in Belgrade.
10:55 At the request of lawyer Jovanović, mobile phones were opened. Upon inspection of the SIM cards, it was determined that they were cut and that the phone number was not visible, only the serial number.
"Lenovo is a cheap device, quite poor quality, with bad functions. I use it occasionally when I am in Montenegro. What is particularly interesting is that this phone does not have good internet via the card. These other devices are in the quality range of "Bubanj potoka". None of of these devices does not have a high-quality internet connection. It is very interesting to me that I have the contents of the laptop that was confiscated, but I do not have the contents of the tablet at all. It would be advisable for the court to ask the prosecutor to explain why the items that were confiscated were returned to a man whose status was not confirmed by the decision of this council," said Jovanović.
10:51 Lawyer Radosavljević said that it is scandalous that the tablet and computer were returned to Sinđelić.
"Now we are inspecting four phones, but there are no tablets and computers. It is completely scandalous that the tablet and computer were returned to Sinđelić. We have a problem comparing them," stated Radosavljević. He also said that only two of the four mobile phones were objects expertise.
10:47 Mobile phones were also shown and confiscated.
"As for the mobile phones, they were confiscated in Serbia and all data was extracted from them and handed over to the court with a search order from the investigating judge. Among the mobile devices that were confiscated was a Lenovo brand phone marked with the number 9. It is a special phone," said Čađenović.
10:41 Lawyer Jovanović said that his conclusion is that some security service "which is involved in this masquerade" brought in this money.
"And that someone very deliberately misled the Serbian state leadership. If the Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs for the fight against terrorism and extremism had not done its part professionally, we would be in the dark today. To my great regret, that service did not act later," he said. is Jovanovic.
10:36 Judge Mugoša noted that the envelopes from which the money was taken were white and brown in color.
10:27 Lawyer Radosavljević said that a large amount of data can be obtained based on the serial numbers of banknotes.
He stated that a large number of 100-euro banknotes were issued in Austria, while 500-euro banknotes were issued in Germany and Austria.
"There is a trace of manipulation, that is, contact with the banknotes. There is no evidence that the source of the money is from Edi," said Radosavljević.
10:25 "The bills are new from the pack and they are in a row one after the other. The bills are brand new, unused, which indicates that they come from a choice made by the organizers of a criminal organization because the bills were taken from Sinđelić's accomplice witness," said Čađenović.
He added that the money was used to finance a criminal plan
10:23 Shown are banknotes in denominations of 500 and 100 euros. 539 pieces of banknotes with a total value of 125.500 euros were confiscated.
10:21 The trial continues with the reading of the certificate on the temporarily confiscated cases of the Ministry of Interior of Serbia from 2016.
9:30 A break was set at 10.15:XNUMX a.m. in order to place the money in the courtroom.
9:25 Lawyer Dušan Radosavljević said that when you look at the frame, it "looks miserable, as if it came from an antique shop".
"If this equipment had come to Montenegro as part of that plan, one wonders when that action would have been carried out," said Radosavljević.
Attorney Jovanović stated that in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, police are spelled in the same way.
9:24 A frame with the inscription "Police" is shown. Prosecutor Čađenović said that the name of the police in Serbia is written in Cyrillic and in Montenegro it is written in Latin.
"Without a doubt, this is intended to print the name of the police on the items so that they are identical to the uniforms of the MUP of Montenegro," said Čađenović.
9:18 "The kits also contain a tactical police water tank that is used by military and police forces during longer operations. The kits are complete with a gas mask and a gun holster, and I believe that these kits have only one purpose, and that is to make the person wearing this more he looks like a member of the MUP of Montenegro," said Čađenović.
9:14 28 sets with protective equipment, cases, gas masks...
9:13 Lawyer Miroje Jovanović stated that this equipment "protects all life".
"A person who would wear this is not protected at all. A person who would wear this could be overpowered by anything," said Jovanović.
9:11 "The equipment is used for police purposes when maintaining public order and peace, and I point out that it is the same or identical to the equipment used by members of the MUP of Montenegro. It was intended to be used by members of a special group that was supposed to come armed to protest on October 16 to shoot and at the same time create a commotion," said prosecutor Saša Čađenović.
9:06 12 sets are shown, consisting of belts, socks, gas masks, protectors, plastic and sponge protectors...
9:05 The trial continued with an examination of the case.
The trial for attempted terrorism on the day of the 2016 parliamentary elections continues today.
Russian citizens Eduard Šišmakov and Vladimir Popov, who are being tried in absentia, as well as Serbian citizens Nemanja Ristic and Predrag Bogićević, are responsible for that criminal offense before the panel of Judge Suzana Mugoša.
Bratislav Dikić, Democratic Front leaders Milan Knežević and Andrija Mandić and Mandić's driver Mihailo Čađenović are on the dock.
The indictment includes Serbian citizens Kristina Hristić and Branka Milić, who are defending themselves from freedom, as well as their compatriots - Srboljub Đorđević, Dragan Maksić, Milan Dušić who are in custody.
The proceedings were split against DF translator Anani Nikić.
Bonus video:
