Lawyer on Mandić's communication with ANB: Point blank shot

The trial continues on Friday at nine o'clock
1015 views 0 comment(s)
Miodrag Šoć
Miodrag Šoć
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

The trial for attempted terrorism on the day of the parliamentary elections continued today in the Podgorica High Court.

Course of trial:

12:54 The trial was adjourned and will resume tomorrow at nine o'clock.

12:38 After the break, Bratislav Dikić said that he noticed that by looking at the communication listings of all the accused, there was no contact with any of the accused.

12:33 Radosavljević said that he noticed the illogic in the listings of how Saša Sinđelić could talk to himself, while being hundreds of kilometers away.

He notes that Sinđelić had communication with Mirko Velimirović and one communication on October 17.10.2016, 447. with a number starting at 769 and ending at XNUMX, "which is attributed to Šishmakov without any proof".

Radosavljević said that one part of the evidence was contaminated.

12:12 Radosavljević notes that there is no evidence that Milan Knežević had communication with other persons, who are on the indictment, except Andrija Mandić and Mihail Čađenović.

"Which includes Eduard Shirokov Šišmakov and Vladimir Popov and other persons," said Radosavljević.

12:05 Lawyer Radosavljević said that listings are legally invalid evidence.

"Here, in the indictment on several different numbers, it is stated that the owner of those numbers is Tamara Magdelenić, which is incorrect and then we got into a situation where she was talking to herself," he said.

11:35 Lawyer Nikola Medojević said that the Prosecutor's Office singled out one "alleged" communication from 2015, where on the one hand there is Andrija Mandić's phone number, "and on the other the number that is kept, so it was said, whether at ANB or the Police Directorate ."

"As a defense attorney, I was surprised by the fact that it was said that it is not known who actually owns that number and who is actually using it. I note that I have not seen and do not see what significance this alleged communication from 2015 has with the indictment in question from 2016. , and therefore I note that extracting that communication was an end in itself. In this sense, I especially note and emphasize that if the intention was to discredit the civic personality of Andrija Mandić, that it was an inappropriate attempt, because it cannot be like that, no matter what discredited by someone who testifies to his convictions with his life and who simply has an indisputable and pure moral legitimation. Therefore, I note that such protest maneuvers are vividly shown to be empty shots and I note that they have no significance either for this procedure, or for the pre-set goal, which is was obviously outside of this procedure," said lawyer Nikola Medojević.

11:24 Lawyer Dražen Medojević said that a huge amount of evidence was presented by the Prosecutor's Office, and in that way the quality of the evidence was concealed.

11:10 Jovanović said that "in many of the listings, we do not have any information about internet communication via mobile devices used by Sinđelić and Velimirović."

He added that according to the listings, Mihailo Čađenović and Andrije Mandić are not in communication with Sinđelić and Velimirović.

"Nowhere and never," Jovanovic said

10:58 Lawyer Miroje Jovanović said that he does not have any listing for Miloš Jovanović, who was heard as an accused.

"It's like he never used a mobile phone," said lawyer Jovanović. He makes an objection to the listings.

The lawyer said that from the listing "we can see the active communication of associate witness Saša Sinđelić with members of the Security Information Agency and the Criminal Police of Serbia during the critical period of the indictment."

10:47 Bratislav Dikić asked not to prolong the court proceedings. He said he was listening to some of the arguments coming out of the indictments

10:45 The trial continued - the request for disqualification of the President of the Council and the President of the Court, submitted by lawyer Jovanović, was rejected.

10:38 The referee called a break.

10:36 Lawyer Jovanović was fined 1.000 euros for disturbing order and discipline.

10:33 "If Milić was examined on November 21.11st in the Emergency Department, she was examined by an internist on November 22nd, and it is clear that at 13:XNUMX p.m. on that day she did not have any internist symptoms. That's all," said the expert.

He said he used gloves and the hands in the photos were not his.

10:27 Attorney Krpović said that the expert report was incomplete and incompetent.

"This expert could not testify to the reports of the internist, dermatologist and neuropsychiatrist," said the lawyer.

10:23 Lawyer Jovanović said that he saw a handful of expert witnesses without gloves next to the body of their client.

The expert said that the lawyer was entering the insult zone, and the judge admonished Jovanovic.

Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić followed up, saying: "I can't bear this."

10:07 The request of lawyer Jovanović to be given a part of the record containing the opinion of the expert was rejected.

10:00 Attorney Krpović asked if it is usual for the examination to be carried out in the lawyer's room:

The expert said he could.

"Isn't that against morals and medical ethics," asks Krpović.

"There is nothing unethical or immoral," Šoć said.

"These are rhetorical questions," said the expert.

9:50 Lawyer Miroje Jovanović asked the expert if he had ever photographed any person in the courthouse during the expert examination.

"On Sunday, I took photos on the order of the prosecution, not on the order of the High Court," Šoć said.

Lawyer Jovanović asked if the expert would hand over to the court the photos from the lawyers' room of the High Court. Šoć answered in the affirmative.

Jovanović asked if the expert had previously performed an expert examination on skin diseases.

Šoć said that he made about 8.000 expertises.

9:29 Branka Milić is being tried in absentia. Expert witness Miodrag Šoć.

Russian citizens Eduard Šišmakov and Vladimir Popov, who are being tried in absentia, as well as Serbian citizens Nemanja Ristić and Predrag Bogićević, are charged before the panel of judge Suzana Mugoša for the criminal offense of attempted terrorism on the day of the parliamentary elections.

Bratislav Dikić, Democratic Front leaders Milan Knežević and Andrija Mandić and Mandić's driver Mihailo Čađenović are on the dock.

The indictment includes the Serbian citizen Kristina Hristić, as well as her compatriots - Srboljub Đorđević, Dragan Maksić, Milan Dušić who are in custody.

The proceedings were split against DF translator Anani Nikić.

Bonus video: