Chief Special Prosecutor Milivoje Katnić accused Serbia's Organized Crime Prosecutor Mladen Nenadić of grossly interfering in the criminal case being conducted before the competent state authorities of Montenegro, the so-called "coup d'état", by obstructing the evidence.
He reacted this way after Nenadić submitted to the local Special State Prosecutor's Office a copy of the official note on the notification collected from the citizen Mirko Velimirović.
Katnić, among other things, reminds his colleague from Serbia that the cooperating witness in that process, Saša Sinđelić, was under secret surveillance measures carried out by the Security Information Agency of the Republic of Serbia (BIA), and was under the control of the same Agency and went to Russia, where he came to the identity of the organizer of this criminal organization:
"And later, again during the duration of secret surveillance measures under the control of BIA officials, he also obtained material evidence - biological material originating from the organizers of this criminal organization, which was seized from the hotel rooms where they stayed, and these are agents of the GRU, which evidence do you possess and which I personally saw in your office in your presence. Also, I remind you that by undertaking secret surveillance measures by the BIA of the Republic of Serbia, Saša Sinđelić's conversation with GRU agents was recorded on several occasions, and, among other things, a conversation in the GRU co-agent ordering Sinđelić to liquidate Mirko Velimirović and the then Prime Minister of Montenegro Milo Đukanović. I also overheard that conversation in your office in your presence, when you said you would deliver it, and yet you did not they didn't even do that," Katnić stated in the letter.
Katnić's letter to Nenadić is transmitted in its entirety:
On the occasion of your document Mp. no. 103/20 of 27.10.2020/258/20, in which you submitted a copy of the official note on the notification collected from citizen Mirko Velimirović Str-pov. 23.10.2020/XNUMX of XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX, as the Chief Special Prosecutor of Montenegro, I appreciate that, by obstructing the evidence, you grossly interfered in the criminal case that is being conducted before the competent state authorities of Montenegro, in which case an investigation was conducted both in Montenegro and in the Republic of Serbia.
Namely, the subject criminal proceedings for the criminal offenses of creating a criminal organization from Article 401a of the Criminal Code of Montenegro, the criminal offense of attempted terrorism from Article 447 paragraph 1 in connection with Article 20 of the Criminal Code of Montenegro, and other criminal offenses in the Republic of Serbia was carried out in the reconnaissance phase independently, and later also according to the requests for the provision of international assistance sent by the Special State Prosecutor's Office of Montenegro.
In Montenegro, the criminal proceedings were fully conducted, in which a first-instance conviction was handed down for all defendants, and it is currently in the phase of appeal proceedings before the Court of Appeal of Montenegro. I note, and I will elaborate on this later, that during the investigation phase you refused to take over the criminal prosecution in relation to the citizens of the Republic of Serbia, Bogićević Predraga and Ristić Nemanja, and at the same time you refused to extradite these defendants for the purpose of conducting criminal proceedings in Montenegro.
Your latest procedure of taking notice as a citizen from the legally convicted Mirko Velimirović in the criminal procedure "attempted terrorism" is a precedent that clearly shows the intention to interfere in the criminal procedure conducted before the competent court of another country, and this is not an isolated case in relation to this procedure .
You should have listened to Velimirović
In the specific case, you could hear Mirko Velimirović on the circumstances of the existence of grounds or well-founded suspicions that a person, including the Chief Special Prosecutor, committed a criminal offense, but you could not gather information on the circumstances of the commission of criminal offenses for which this person has already been legally convicted.
This is because in connection with the criminal legal matter, which Mirko Velimirović pleaded before your deputy Jovica Jovanović, an investigation, an investigation, a main trial was conducted after which the High Court in Podgorica issued a first-instance verdict, and the proceedings are ongoing. on appeal before the Court of Appeal.
From the contents of the official note, it follows that it was made tendentially, in order to achieve several goals, but before pointing out those goals, I remind you of the following: - The state authorities of the Republic of Serbia, and above all the Special Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime, were obliged to prevent the activities of a criminal organization in in the direction of the realization of a criminal plan by committing the criminal act of terrorism, and in connection with the events of 2016, and to thwart all actions of members of the criminal organization, both citizens of the Republic of Serbia and citizens of other countries who operated from your territory, and in the direction of achieving any element of the criminal offense of terrorism on the territory of Montenegro, especially since you were informed about all the events and persons, bearing in mind that both members and organizers of the criminal organization were subject to secret surveillance measures.
First of all, you are bound by the internal laws of the Republic of Serbia, and above all, international regulations on the fight against terrorism; - As you knew everything, and based on the secret surveillance measures implemented by the state authorities of the Republic of Serbia, and the results of the criminal proceedings conducted in Montenegro, you were obliged, and you did not do so, that after certain authorities of the Republic of Serbia , and parts of the Security Information Agency of the Republic of Serbia acted to obstruct the evidence, and this refers primarily to the treatment of Saša Sinđelić - a cooperating witness in the criminal proceedings in question, to take measures with the aim of prosecuting those persons and preventing the actions of members of the criminal organization who apparently remained 3 intentionally unidentified by your government authorities.
Interference with evidence and through TV
Specifically, if you are not informed (and I don't believe you are), I would like to inform you that the media - TV "Happy" - were also used to obstruct the evidence in relation to the witness Saša Sinđelić's collaborator when Sinđelić gave the interview under the instructions, control and supervision of the Bezbjedonno information agency officials. of the Republic of Serbia. - Finally, you were obliged, and yet you did not take any action, that when Mirko Velimirović, who is serving a prison sentence in KPZ Ćuprija, approached you and when it was clear to you from his testimony that he was instructed by other persons to give such notifications, to open an investigation in the direction of revealing the identity of the perpetrators of serious criminal offenses against official duties and criminal offenses against judicial authorities.
Let me remind you, if you have forgotten, and I believe you haven't, Saša Sinđelić was under secret surveillance measures carried out by the Security Information Agency of the Republic of Serbia, and is under the control of the same Agency and went to Russia, where he found out the identity of the organizer of this criminal organization , and later, again during the duration of secret surveillance measures under the control of BIA officials, he also obtained material evidence - biological material originating from the organizers of this criminal organization, which was seized from the hotel rooms where they were staying, and these are GRU agents -a, which evidence you have and which I personally saw in your office in your presence.
Also, I remind you that by undertaking secret surveillance measures by the BIA of the Republic of Serbia, Saša Sinđelić's conversation with GRU agents was recorded on several occasions, including a conversation in which GRU agents ordered Sinđelić to liquidate Mirko Velimirović and the then Prime Minister of Montenegro Gore Milo Đukanović.
I also overheard that conversation in your office in your presence, when you said you would deliver it, and yet you didn't do it either. Also, for the sake of reminding, we also overheard a conversation in which the purchase of rifles that were to be transferred to Montenegro was agreed upon, and about which the state authorities of Montenegro informed you.
Also, as a reminder, the meetings of Saša Sinđelić with the agents of the GRU in Kalemegdan were also documented in order to implement the secret surveillance measures that you undertook. I remind you that these pictures have traveled around the world and have been published in all leading world media.
You did not submit those recordings, which were obtained in a legal manner by applying secret surveillance measures, but that is why you handed them over, including the intercepted conversations, to Patrushev with the promise that you would not hand them over to the state authorities of Montenegro.
Vučić spoke publicly about the evidence, I will not allow you to throw my "face" under your feet
I will remind you that before that you submitted all the evidence, which was apparently delivered to everyone except the state authorities of Montenegro for the purpose of conducting criminal proceedings, to the then Prime Minister of the Republic of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, who publicly spoke about the content of that evidence, stating that he would not allow the Government to Anyone who would participate in the commission of criminal acts or in the preparation of the murder of foreign officials is sitting in the Republic of Serbia, that irrefutable material evidence has been collected about everything, that the Prime Minister of Montenegro at the time was monitored daily and that this information was delivered to other persons in order to take further actions , and that the then Prime Minister of Montenegro was monitored by state-of-the-art devices, and that the competent authorities of the Republic of Serbia have everything documented with photographs, recordings and direct confessions.
Now I want to tell you why I am addressing you in this way. Your president Aleksandar Vučić mentioned eyes and ears, that he saw and heard everything, but he did not mention the face, so you gave yourself the right to throw my "face" under your feet. I cannot and will not allow you to do that.
As I stated in relation to the goals you tried to realize before the hearing of Mirko Velimirović, your first goal was to create a situation where the evidence obtained in a legal manner, the testimony of Mirko Velimirović, was presented as a statement given under duress and deception, and that as such evidence is not fit to base a judgment on.
Your deputy introduces the name "Dejan" into the proceedings with deliberate insolence
For the sake of clarification, your deputy pretends to be inept, as if he does not know that the Chief Special Prosecutor of Montenegro does not conduct pre-trial proceedings, and for the first time, with deliberate insolence, he introduces the name "Dejan" into the proceedings which, under the threat of his life, forced Velimirović to report to the police. although you know it well, that the director of the National Security Agency of Montenegro at that time, and still today, was Dejan Peruničić, so you would like to introduce him into this story in this way.
Also, as an unskilled and inexperienced prosecutor, through the mouth of citizen Mirko Velimirović, he leads him to say that Velimirović rejected Sinđelić and that he did not buy rifles with the money that Sinđelić handed over to him, but that he was encouraged to do so by Milivoje Katnić (by which Milivoje Katnić encouraged Velimirović to commit a criminal act). In contrast, Mirko Velimirović presented all the facts in his first visit to the Montenegrin police, which he repeated until the end of the main trial.
Why am I putting this on you as the Chief Special Prosecutor of Montenegro? Because you know everything from the secret surveillance measures you have and because anti-fascist Serbia will never forgive you for this kind of behavior. You are doing all this, and you don't know what you are doing, in order to effect the annulment of the first-instance verdict, which is now before the Court of Appeals in the appeal procedure.
In order to strengthen previously through the given testimony of Velimirović, that the Chief Special Prosecutor of Montenegro gave him - 5 suggestions to Velimirović what he should state as a defendant, and above all that he should indict Andrija Mandić, Milan Knežević and the Democratic Front, you deliberately - maliciously forget that in this criminal case, Velimirović of his own volition, in accordance with the provision of Article 401a paragraph 4 in relation to paragraph 2 and everything in relation to paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code of Montenegro, discovered and contributed to the discovery of a criminal organization whose members and organizers were tried before the High Court in Podgorica.
Velimirović, after he was finally convicted by the same court and testified after being called as a witness and where he was interrogated in the period from February 08.02.2018, 01.03.2018 to March XNUMX, XNUMX, during which time he came and left Montenegro at his discretion Above, eight times in total, so it's surprising why your deputy didn't ask him, even though he had no right to do so, nor to question him about the circumstances on which he questioned him, how he was put under pressure, what he will say in court when he freely left the territory of Montenegro at the time of giving his testimony at the main trial.
If by chance the Chief Special Prosecutor had not taught him what he would say at the main trial on the territory of Serbia?
He neither did it nor could he do it, but it was done by the same members of the Security Information Agency, who until then "took care" of collecting all the evidence in this criminal legal matter.
You also forget that during the investigation phase that you conducted, and at the request of the Chief Special Prosecutor of Montenegro, you obtained and obtained evidence of the guilt of Milan Knežević and Andrije Mandić for the criminal offense for which they were found guilty by the first-instance verdict.
You extradited Sinđelić, interrogated Nikić
You handed over Saša Sinđelić to the state authorities of Montenegro, you interrogated Slavko Nikić, a colonel of the Serbian police, based on whose testimony an order was passed to expand the investigation for the accused Andrija Mandić and Milan Knežević, and you also submitted other evidence.
As a reminder, Nikić Slavko magically changed his testimony at the main trial before the High Court in Podgorica when he was interrogated via video link, so I ask you if by any chance you also collected information from this citizen on the circumstances, whether and if so who influenced him to change his testimony or whether someone instructed him how to testify only in front of your Deputy, when that same witness demanded that the special prosecutor from Montenegro not attend his hearing. Interestingly, you did not bother to take notice of these circumstances, nor to determine who influenced Nikić Slavko in the Republic of Serbia to change his statement.
Undeniably, judicial practice knows situations where a witness changes his testimony in criminal proceedings, but it is really for the Guinness Book of Records that three witnesses in the Republic of Serbia, who are well known to you - Sinđelić, Velimirović and Nikić Slavko, changed their testimony in Serbia. and that at the time when the first-instance proceedings were in the final stage or had ended. 6 Finally, I admit that it is my weakness, and it is difficult for me to believe in the obvious truth that the man who is the Special Prosecutor for Organized Crime of the Republic of Serbia accepted to interrogate Mirko Velimirović, who is in the Ćupri Prison, in his capacity as a citizen, and that he may have information about endangering the life of a person and the security of the State of Serbia, and that the record indicates so.
I also admit weakness and I cannot accept that a person of your professional experience can allow himself that in an institution such as the Special Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime of the Republic of Serbia, in the capacity of a citizen, Mirko Velimirović is questioned about the circumstances of the purchase of rifles and that you expect this person to tell the truth and put oneself in the situation of being responsible for the qualified form of the criminal offense of illegal production, possession, carrying and trafficking of weapons and explosive substances from Article 348 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, which is punishable by a prison sentence of two to twelve years, in a situation where criminal offense from the same article when a small quantity of weapons was found on him from the basic form of this criminal offense sentenced to imprisonment.
Dikić admitted to some of the actions he was accused of
But let's start from the beginning. In view of your surprising ignorance, even though you are well versed in everything, I suggest the following: Obtain the case files of the Basic Public Prosecutor's Office from Niš formed against unknown persons for the criminal offense of endangering security from article 138 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia from February 2018 .year, and in those documents you will find that the daughter of the accused Dikić Bratislava was threatened by an unknown man who grabbed the injured Kristina Dikić by her hood on the street, pulled her back and told her "look at the child, tell your father to be careful what he says at the trial, not to kill you all".
In those days, during the main trial, the accused Dikić Bratislav admitted to some of the actions he was accused of, which was obviously very bad for the criminal organization, so he was also threatened by the defense - the lawyer with the words "be careful what you say", which was stated in the record of the High Court in Podgorica Ks. no. 14/17 of January 26.01.2018, XNUMX. In addition to this, the defendant's family was threatened, as stated above, so his family did not report this event to the state authorities of the Republic of Serbia, and not even to you as the undisputed authority in the position you perform, because they were afraid, but they reported it to the state authorities of Montenegro. Gore, who took all the necessary actions, and through the state authorities of the Republic of Serbia, to protect the family of one of the accused. It is clear that the pressure on this accused not to present his defense in the direction of admitting the commission of a criminal offense was exerted in Serbia by members of the security services of the Republic of Serbia.
As I stated regarding threats, fear, influence and teaching witnesses to change their testimony in this criminal case in connection with Nikić Slavko 7, you have in your possession the testimony of this witness that he gave before your deputy during the investigation phase and the testimony that given via video link at the main hearing before the High Court in Podgorica. You have to agree, willingly or unwillingly, that Nikić Slavko did not come to Montenegro, that there was no communication between the special prosecutors of Montenegro and this witness, that this witness changed his testimony. Who influenced him? A certain group of people whose interest was that the epilogue in this criminal legal matter should not be a conviction for the accused Andrija Mandić and Milan Knežević.
Saša Sinđelić testified before the High Court in Podgorica for several months and was exposed to questions from the defense, which were often humiliating for the cooperating witness, and yet Sinđelić testified the truth during that entire period, as the court eventually found. After that, he returned to Serbia by his own choice. The same group of people whose interest is refuting the testimony of this cooperating witness arranged for Sinđelić to be a guest on the TV show "Happy", accompanied by these people - members of the BIA.
Someone threatened Sinđelić in Serbia
Most interesting of all, and what is the fact, that same Saša Sinđelić flees from Serbia to Montenegro and seeks asylum, fully aware that he will be extradited to Croatia. To help you draw a conclusion, someone threatened Saša Sinđelić, a citizen of the Republic of Serbia in Serbia, in such a way that he had to flee. Before that, so much pressure was put on him that he had to be under secret surveillance again and to talk about the events in Montenegro again under those secret surveillance measures.
You have to wonder how secret surveillance measures were applied to the same person with a difference of almost three years for the same criminal legal event. It is obvious that someone needed Sinđelić to tell his "friends" what was happening in Montenegro in the alleged measures of secret surveillance.
Those recordings of secret surveillance measures taken were submitted by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Smederevo on January 14.01.2020, XNUMX, but those same recordings were tried by the defense of the defendants Andrija Mandić and Milan Knežević in the closing arguments of the main trial.
I ask you, as the head of the Special Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime, who handed over those recordings to the lawyers less than a month after they were created? Have you researched it. Do you know that? I instruct you to request from the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Smederevo the letter of the Special State Prosecutor's Office of Montenegro Kt-S No. 271/16 dated February 03.02.2020, XNUMX, and you will see that the Special State Prosecutor's Office of Montenegro has indicated how the "secret surveillance measures" arose.
To clarify, the measures were created with the full knowledge of Saša Sinđelić, who was pressured, threatened, taught and demanded by the officers of the Security Information Agency of the Republic of Serbia to participate in that 8 farce and to give the famous interview before recording those bar conversations on "Happy" TV.
The evidence for this is the testimony of Saša Sinđelić given as a witness before the Special State Prosecutor's Office on record Ktr-S 159/19 dated June 22.06.2019, XNUMX. In that statement, the witness describes in detail what the BIA officers did to him in Serbia, how he was subjected to torture, and you and the Prosecution of Serbia are silent about it, even though we asked for the exchange of evidence on all the facts related to the treatment of Saša Sinđelić.
Again, so that you would not be mistaken, or that you would not be misinformed and informed, there is also a letter from Saša Sinđelić, which was given to the lawyer in the Republic of Serbia, Nada Mitrović Rakić from Smederevo, in which Sinđelić states that any change to his testimony that he gave before the High Court in Podgorica to be the product of threats to his safety and that of his family.
That letter was written by Sinđelić on February 20.02.2019, XNUMX, that is, before the "secret surveillance measures" were taken against him and his escape to Montenegro. You will have to admit that the Chief Special Prosecutor of Montenegro could not have influenced Sinđelić to write this letter, if he was already under secret surveillance measures and monitored by the officials of the Security Information Agency of the Republic of Serbia, but that this is a product of his will and desire to remain the same the allegations he made before the High Court in Podgorica.
Although you will certainly not accept any of the above, let me introduce you, you can also read the letter of Saša Sinđelić, which he wrote during his stay in extradition detention, while he was awaiting extradition, in which he explains the actions of BIA officials and their methods, and which were apparently also applied to Mirko Velimirović.
BIA officials committed and continue to commit the most serious crimes
Familiarize yourself with this letter, you may find, and I claim that there is, a well-founded suspicion that the BIA officials mentioned in the letters and in the testimony of Saša Sinđelić committed and continue to commit the most serious crimes against official duty and the judiciary.
Also, don't forget to find out who from the prosecutor's organization of the Republic of Serbia is giving the lawyers secret surveillance measures, because we know that this is also a criminal offense. Do your best to find the perpetrators of crimes in your house. It won't be difficult for you.
If even that is not enough for you, consider in detail the notifications that you have collected, that is, that have been served to you by Velimirović Mirko.
You have listings of Mirko Velimirović's communications from his phones, you submitted them to us as evidence in the criminal proceedings. You will see from them that when Mirko Velimirović came to report his findings to the Montenegrin police, he did not call anyone to meet him in Montenegro, least of all Dejan.
You also have records of the crossing of state borders for Mirko Velimirović, so you will see that in the period from 07.02.2018 to 01.03.2018 (that is the time when Velimirović testified at the main 9 trial) he left Montenegro several times and went to the Republic of Serbia, so surely the Chief Special Prosecutor did not go with him to instruct him in Serbia on what to say.
Finally, if what he gave you as a notification as a citizen is correct, why didn't you ask him who he was afraid of in Serbia. The answer is - from BIA officials, members of a criminal organization that you "didn't" identify but have continued to operate all this time.
On the minutes of Ktr-S no. 50/17 of April 03.04.2017, 16.01.2017, behold a miracle, but not a big one, and Velimirović escapes from Serbia and comes back to Montenegro, where he was "bullied, forced and taught" what to say, so he in that statement he described the reasons why, in what way, how and under what circumstances he signed the statement with the lawyer Zoran Janjićijević and which was certified on 526. before the Basic Court in Novi Pazar under the number OV I no. 2017/XNUMX, that he was asked to enter in that statement that he does not know Dikić Bratislava and that he has nothing to do with it, and that he was asked to enter in the statement that he does not he also knows Saša Sinđelić.
He states that he did all this out of fear for his safety. Mirko Velimirović comes to Montenegro again in July 2017, when he is again heard as a witness, on the record of Ktr-S no. 155/17 of 07.07.2017 and in that statement, and on the occasion of the statement given to the lawyer Zoran Janjićijević and which was certified on January 16.01.2017, 526 before the Basic Court in Novi Pazar under the number OV I no. 2017/XNUMX.
In essence, Velimirović states that he was afraid, that he noticed people unknown to him visiting his house, that he was afraid of people from Niš and other persons who are being prosecuted in Montenegro for the criminal offense of attempted terrorism.
He further states that he asked the lawyer to get in touch with the persons who are in the criminal proceedings, and he also got in touch with the lawyers of the defendant Dikić Bratislava at the time, he himself drew up the statement that Mirko Velimirović signed without reading it.
In the same statement, the witness Mirko Velimirović states that he told the truth in the criminal proceedings in Montenegro, that he came to the Montenegrin police on his own, that no one sent him there, and that everything about his conviction regarding weapons is true and correct .
This witness states that he was afraid for the safety of his family and that after giving a statement in front of the lawyer, all threats and visits to the house by unknown people stopped.
Mirko Velimirović states before your deputy that his statements were prepared in advance at the Special State Prosecutor's Office and that he only signed them.
This is exactly one of the goals I am telling you about, but you forget that Mirko Velimirović was always interrogated with the use of audio and video technical devices, and you will see that Velimirović himself gives his testimony during which he neither cries nor shows any fear.
It is clear that in Montenegro he felt safe and out of any danger. Also, although I am sure that you already have them, I am also sending you the minutes (audio and 10 video recordings) of Mirko Velimirović's testimony before the High Court in Podgorica, from which you can see the way in which Velimirović testified.
How much the Chief Special Prosecutor put pressure on Velimirović and taught him what to say, you can best see from the recording of the interview that Mirko Velimirović gave in his house in Brnjak to a journalist for the preparation of the documentary film "Conspiracy" by Šemsudin Radončić, which was shown at the documentary film festival in Sarajevo, the extracts of which I am submitting to you and which are published on the Internet.
Certainly no one then whispered to him what he was going to say, nor taught him about it, and you will see for yourself that Velimirović completely repeated his testimony given at the main hearing before the High Court in Podgorica, especially regarding weapons and their procurement. Finally, Mirko Velimirović was found guilty by the judgment of the High Court in Podgorica Kvs. no. 149/16 of 07.12.2016 for the criminal offense of creating a criminal organization from Article 401a paragraph 4 in connection with paragraph 2 and everything in connection with paragraph 1. CC of Montenegro, in which he admitted that he had acquired weapons for the needs of a criminal organization.
It is very clear from everything that has been presented that according to all the witnesses in this criminal legal matter, BIA officials, with the help and together with individuals from the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Serbia, in every possible way by abusing their official positions, tried to obtain benefits for other persons, while acted according to a prior agreement and a previously accepted criminal plan as members of a criminal organization, all with the aim of benefiting the accused Milan Knežević, Andrija Mandić, and Bratislava Dikić in the form of avoiding criminal liability for the crimes committed.
In the indicated manner, they are suspected of having committed the criminal offense of abuse of official position from Article 357 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia.
All of the above indisputably indicates that there is a well-founded suspicion that certain members of this criminal organization, through their actions, achieved all the essential characteristics of the criminal offense of preventing and obstructing evidence from Article 336 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, and other members of this criminal organization, officers of the Security Information Agency of the Republic of Serbia and the officers of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Smederevo and the criminal offense of unauthorized wiretapping and recording from Article 143 paragraph 3 in connection with paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Serbia, considering that it is not in dispute that they were uninvited persons - defense attorneys, lawyers Miroj Jovanović and Dušan Radosavljević was given the secret surveillance measures that were carried out on Saša Sinđelić and thus enabled them to become familiar with their content, bearing in mind that the secret surveillance measures in question were carried out illegally with the full knowledge of Saša Sinđelić, as the person against whom the measures are being applied secret surveillance.
Therefore, the secret surveillance measures in question are illegal, and the person was eavesdropped without authorization. 11 The notifications you have collected are the result of the criminal act of extorting a statement from Article 136 of the CC RS, which statement was coerced by officials in the performance of their official duties - members of the BIA , which are with the use of threats, and as can be seen from the very condition of Mirko Velimirović, that he is more than scared and on the verge of a nervous breakdown because of the safety of his family, and he was forced first to request to be allegedly urgently heard by you, and then gave a forced and pre-prepared statement.
In view of the above, and bearing in mind the numerous evidences that we provide you with this answer, I hope that this time you will act professionally and that in accordance with the laws of the Republic of Serbia, and above all the prosecutor's ethics, which you have neglected so far, you will initiate the procedure of determining criminal responsibility towards persons who have committed the most serious criminal acts as stated.
Related Articles
See more:
Download the app and follow the news
FOLLOW US ON
