No vehicles or weapons were used in the attack

Beranac is suspected of several serious crimes

10943 views 0 comment(s)
The car in which Sujković and Kastrat were, Photo: Police Department
The car in which Sujković and Kastrat were, Photo: Police Department
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

Neither the vehicle nor the firearm used in the attempted murder has yet been found Kenan Sujkovic, Ismet Sujkovic i Mirza Kastrata in Berane, which is one of the reasons to extend the detention of the suspect Miomir Đukić (32)

This is stated in the decision of the Supreme Court of February 16, which left the thirty-two-year-old behind bars for at least another three months.

"There is a well-founded suspicion that the defendant Đ. (Đukić) drove the vehicle in question during the commission of a criminal offense in B. (Berane), that it is necessary to obtain other clues related to the commission of criminal offenses and to conduct numerous evidences, which indicates that the release of the defendant could affect the course of the investigation through the destruction or concealment of evidence and traces of the committed criminal act", explained the judges of the Supreme Court.

In the order for the investigation of the Special State Prosecutor's Office (SDT), which was cited in the decision of the Supreme Court, it is stated that Đukić became a member of a criminal organization that was founded by his fellow citizen, behind unknown persons. Marko Zekic (30) whose goal was to commit more murders, as well as criminal acts - extortion, illegal possession of weapons and explosives, and drug smuggling.

Zekić is suspected of having tried to kill Kenan and Ismet Sujković, as well as Mirza Kastrat on November 18, while Đukić was then arrested on suspicion of complicity.

"His role was to carry out the orders and instructions of the organizers of the criminal organization, and to participate in the collection of data on the movements of persons who should be killed and their delivery to other members of the criminal organization, to monitor and report the movements of those persons, as well as to, together with other members of the criminal organization, organization commits the crimes of aggravated murder and murder," according to the quoted files of the SDT.

LIQUIDATION AT VERUŠA

It is stated that from the files of the SDT there is a well-founded suspicion that the defendant Đukić was a co-perpetrator in the commission of the criminal act - aggravated murder, that is, that he participated in the liquidation of Nemanja Prelević and Danil Peković.

The two were killed in Veruša on October 18, 2020.

Besides him, Nenad Milačić, Vasilije Đukić, Dragan Biletić, Mirčeta Mihajlović, Goran Milašinović, Marko Zekić, Branislav Ivanović and Dragan Tarić are also suspected of participating in that crime.

The well-founded suspicion of Đukić's participation, he writes, is first of all established from the data provided by EUROPOL, and in connection with the communications that were carried out via protected mobile phones and the Sky ECC application.

"Thus, the entire communication from the beginning of August 2020 to the end of that year is full of messages between the defendants regarding the preparations and actions taken to carry out the murder, and from the exchanged messages it can be seen that the defendants undertook actions to monitor the movement of the injured Prelevic and to search for the best location and time to commit a criminal offense", it is written in the case files.

The investigation was not completed for objective reasons

In the current course of custody of the defendant Đukić, the investigation could not be completed for objective reasons, according to the judges.

"This is because it is evident that during the duration of that detention, an order was passed to conduct the investigation of the Special State Prosecutor's Office dated 24.12. 2021, which practically started criminal proceedings for serious crimes, and it is quite certain that from the day of the order until now, the evidentiary actions that are necessary to shed light on very complex criminal-legal events have not been able to be carried out to the extent necessary to makes a decision whether there will be an indictment or a suspension of the criminal proceedings," the document explains.

Bonus video: