The secretary of the Podgorica High Court was heard today at the Basic State Prosecutor's Office and announced that she is joining the criminal prosecution against the defendants in the "Tunel" case.
This was confirmed to "Vijesta" by the defense attorney of the defendant Nikola Milačić, attorney Maja Turković.
She said that the prosecution, at the very end of the investigation, asked the interrogated, where and how the drugs are stored in the High Court in the "Krstović Voli" case, which, she states, "is a clear indication that even after nine months of conducting the investigation, the prosecution has no absolutely no idea what is the motive of the client to dig the tunnel to the depot of the High Court".
"Today, in front of the Basic State Prosecutor's Office in Podgorica, in the capacity of the authorized representative of the injured party - the High Court in Podgorica, the secretary of this court was heard, who on behalf of the High Court in Podgorica joined the criminal prosecution against the defendants and presented a property-legal claim. In my opinion, this is another in a series of empty steps, in the wandering, senseless and empty walk of the prosecution that has been going on for nine months. So, today's hearing of the representative of the injured party is only one formal legal step, which the prosecution does not contribute to this case in any way, but it is the same done in order to create the appearance of working on the case. In this regard, it is a little crazy that the High Court today joins the criminal prosecution and emphasizes the property legal claim against the defendants for whom the Supreme Court of Montenegro abolished their detention , found that there are no facts and evidence against these persons from which there is a well-founded suspicion that they have committed the criminal acts for which they are charged," said Turković.
DON'T MISS IT
She added that the only logical move by the representatives of the High Court at today's hearing could have been to drop the criminal prosecution against the defendants, "considering the result of the investigation, and that they will make a statement in that direction when the prosecution has unequivocally established who are the perpetrators, the principals and which is the motive.
"However, today we had the opportunity to see that the goal of the High Court and the prosecutor's office is not to find out who the real perpetrators are, and to establish the truth and solve this criminal-legal matter in a legal and complete way, but on the contrary, their goal is to solve the case since Also, the extent to which the prosecutor's office wanders, and how inefficient and ineffective the investigation in question is, is also shown by the fact that the witness heard today was asked where and in what way the drugs are stored in the case of 'Krstović Voli', which at the same time indicates the frivolity of the investigation which is conducted in that case as well, to which the witness replied that the said drug was not in the depot at the time of the raid, but in a separate office, located on the first floor, which is provided with video surveillance and bars with an audible alarm," says Turković. .
He points out that the prosecution's question, and that, he says, at the very end of the investigation, "is a clear indication that the prosecution, even after nine months of conducting the investigation, has absolutely no idea what the motive of the client was to dig the tunnel to the High Court depot.
"...This is especially so given the fact that at the very beginning of the investigation they unequivocally claimed that the goal was to contaminate, that is, to compromise the evidence in certain criminal cases that are pending before this court, in the first place that the motive is a weapon in the proceedings that are conducted regarding the murder of the deceased Duško Jovanović," Turković assesses.
"Court proceedings have not even been announced, this will obviously be an investigation without an end, since the prosecution is more than aware that the end of the investigation cannot be the filing of an indictment, but on the contrary, a decision to suspend it, due to lack of evidence," she concluded.
Bonus video:
