SDT appealed against the court's decision to exclude content from the Anom application from the case

The SDT says that there was a "significant violation of the provisions of the criminal procedure and an incorrectly established factual situation". It was suggested that the court's decision be annulled and the case be returned for re-trial and decision-making, "because the evidence that was extracted is legally valid".

12037 views 1 comment(s)
Prosecutor's office building in Podgorica (illustration), Photo: Luka Zeković
Prosecutor's office building in Podgorica (illustration), Photo: Luka Zeković
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

The Special State Prosecutor's Office (SDT) appealed against the High Court's decision to exclude from the case transcripts of conversations conducted through the once protected ANOM application.

"The Special State Prosecutor's Office filed an appeal against the decision of the High Court in Podgorica, Kvso No. 29/24, dated November 21 of this year, which separated from the file: a USB flash memory with communications from the now decrypted 'Anom' application, delivered by the Ministry of Justice of the United States of America, translation of certain parts of that communication, from Albanian to Montenegrin language and official notes on the identification of the defendants: DV, BV, SZ, MM, FK, A.Đ and TJ. The appeal was filed with the Court of Appeal of Montenegro, due to a significant violation of the provisions of the criminal procedure and the erroneously established factual situation, and it was proposed to cancel the decision of the High Court in Podgorica and return the case to a new trial and decision, because the evidence which have been separated are legally valid", said SDT.

The extra-judicial panel of the High Court in Podgorica, presided over by Judge Nenad Vujanović, issued a decision by which, in the process of controlling the indictment against the defendants Milan Janković and other defendants for creating a criminal organization, as legally invalid, numerous evidence of encrypted communication was excluded from the case file. "Anom", which the Special State Prosecutor's Office submitted to the court with the indictment.

Bonus video: