Where did the accusatory statements "disappear": Investigation into the wounding of two Podgorica residents

The brother-in-law of state parliament speaker Andrija Mandić is accused of blocking the path of Darko Perović and Aris Turković in a parliamentary vehicle early on Saturday morning, April 19, and firing several shots at them...

71912 views 32 reactions 31 comment(s)
Arrest of Mandić at the Higher State Prosecutor's Office, Photo: Boris Pejović
Arrest of Mandić at the Higher State Prosecutor's Office, Photo: Boris Pejović
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

Although he is a legal representative Danilo Mandic claimed that his client was charged with attempted murder solely based on the statements of the two injured parties, who denied during the hearing at the Higher State Prosecutor's Office (VDT) that he had shot them and did not join the criminal prosecution of the thirty-five-year-old.

Brother of the head of the state parliament Andrije Mandić He is accused of blocking the road with a parliamentary vehicle early on Saturday, April 19th. Darko Perović i Aris Turković and fired several shots at them...

Attorney Miroje Jovanovic A few days ago, he said that Mandić was suspected only based on the statement of the alleged injured party, who then failed to appear before the prosecutor for two days in a row...

"These are claims from people we can't possibly hear or see... You can't detain someone based on their word. There has to be some trace... Danilo Mandić was detained based on his word, and his word to the police...", he said on April 21, the day before prosecutor Jelena Protić ordered the forced bringing of the witness - the injured party Perović.

The wounded man, however, was adamant during the interrogation that Mandić did not shoot at him, claiming that he had suffered threats and blackmail from the police to accuse the Podgorica resident of wounding him.

The police therefore announced that they would file criminal charges against Perović for false reporting.

At the same time, Perović said that he would not join the criminal prosecution against Mandić, "because there is no reason to," but he would join the prosecution against the person who shot him, if his identity is revealed.

"When I left the '697' cafe, the traffic light was red. I noticed a white car, I don't remember the make, maybe a Renault Clio or a Peugeot 205, from which three guys got out, and this vehicle flashed at me before. Two of the guys were about 1,70 m tall, and the third was shorter than them. I opened the door, got out of the vehicle and started running, because I saw a gun in the hands of this shorter guy. At that moment, I was on the sidewalk when that guy fired one bullet and hit me in the left lower leg, and then all three got into the vehicle and left the scene," he told the prosecutor.

Turković told the prosecutor that he did not remember any details about when he was wounded, stating that he only saw the injury when he woke up at home, but that he did not know how it occurred.

"I have a great relationship with Perović Darko and Mandić Danilo. We drank a lot of alcohol and at one point I felt sick. I know someone took the car key and I left the bar, and from that moment on I don't remember anything. The next thing I remember is waking up at home and feeling pain in my leg."

Bonus video: