An argument between two brothers from Rožaje ended with the arrest of one of them - DB who threatened his brother with the same initials, holding a wooden bar in his hand, to cut off his head and kill him.
During the hearing before the prosecutor, Rožajac asked the Prosecutor's Office "to send him immediately to custody, because he will commit an even worse crime"...
The incident occurred on May 30th in the village of Bijela Crkva, and an argument between the brothers began over allegedly unpaid wages for work on the construction of a house, which is when DB was arrested.
By a decision of the Basic Court in Rožaje, on June 1, he was ordered to be detained for up to 30 days.
The court documents, which "Vijesti" has had access to, state that he is charged with the criminal offense of domestic violence or violence in a family community.
The prosecution suspects that this Rožaje resident endangered the safety of a family member, his brother, on the penultimate day of May, around 19.30:XNUMX p.m. D.B., threatening to attack his life and body...
His brother told the prosecutor that about thirty minutes before the incident, he had come from Kruševac to the village of Bijela Crkva and spoken to his mother and sister. MB i P. B. which had already arrived from Serbia.
"Sometime around 19.30:30 p.m., his brother D. came to the house and asked him to come out. He then came out of the house and D. immediately verbally attacked him, telling him that he had allegedly cheated him and that he owed him 30 daily allowances for building the house. He told him that he did not owe him any money. However, he insisted, so at that moment an argument broke out between them, to which he replied that he would pay him XNUMX daily allowances when he paid for the apartment in Kruševac where he had been living for four months without a single dinar. Then D. told him: Do you want me to cut off your head?", the judges quote the statement of the injured party DB given before the prosecutor.
This Rožajac resident in Kruševac told the prosecutor that he had told his brother at the time that there was no need for that, but that it did not make him understand.
"D. then took a wooden plank about a meter long and walked towards me," he said.
He said that then, between the brothers, his mother and sister stood, after which his brother told him: "I'll rip your head off, I'll kill you."
The injured party then, he told the prosecutor, called the police and entered the house, while his brother returned to his house, which is about twenty meters away.
"In the meantime, a police patrol arrived and while they were detaining DD, he said to him: 'I'm sorry I didn't kill you'. After that, the police officers put D. in a vehicle and took him to the police station. From these threatening words that D. said to him, he was scared and felt threatened, because D. was very angry and aggressive. Grounded suspicion arises from the statements of witnesses MB and SB, which are essentially consistent with the statement of the injured party's witness DB," the decision ordering detention states.
The judges, who decided on the appeal of his defense attorney, who requested the termination of his detention, explained that the reasonable suspicion that DB committed a criminal offense also stems from the defense he gave during the hearing before the competent prosecutor's office:
"And the same represents a substantive legal condition for ordering detention, while the fact of whether he actually committed the criminal offense he is charged with will be determined in the further course of the criminal proceedings," it is written in the decision rejecting the appeal as unfounded.
Emphasizing that the suspect begged the prosecutor's office to immediately send him into custody, so that he would not commit an even worse crime, the judges assessed that there was a real danger that the suspect, if released, would commit the crime he was threatening.
"The contested decision established the existence of reasonable suspicion, as a material and legal basis for ordering detention, and a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the evidence on which the reasonable suspicion is based will be the subject of an adversarial trial, if it occurs. Therefore, in the view of this court, the facts and circumstances arising from the evidence contained in the case files would satisfy an independent observer with regard to the possibility that the suspect is reasonably suspected of having committed the criminal offenses with which he is charged," the court's decision states.
Bonus video:
