Under moral, material and criminal responsibility, I assume responsibility for the use of the facility registered in LN 7743, number KP 3827/7, KO Podgorica III (it is the notorious Lamela "C", at the foot of Ljubović - op.a.), as well as to assume responsibility for the life and health of third parties and the security of property of third parties for the duration of the use of the object in question, and that I am responsible for direct or indirect damage caused to third parties resulting from the use of the said object - it is stated in the statement made by Mr. Petricevic - the executive director of "PS Gradnje", the company that built the notorious Lamela "C" at the foot of the Ljubović hill - certified by a notary on July 27, 2021 - a whole two and a half years ago - only to find out, just these days, that that statement is an important moment in the proceedings which - according to the lawsuit of several tenants of the notorious Lamela "C" - are being conducted before the Basic Court in Podgorica - against the Ministry of Spatial Planning, Urbanism and State Property and the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the company "Protection of the Area of Montenegro" DOO Danilovgrad - because, watch out now: "disturbance of property" - or, more precisely, disturbance of property that the state perceives as illegal.
If I understood correctly - the gentlemen who bought the apartments in the illegally erected building are suing the state for disturbing the property, referring, among other things, to the statement of Petričević - who, I must stress, illegally erected that building - about assuming responsibility in the event that if something happens, God forbid, does it - and now everything is in the hands of God, that is, the judiciary - which means that unimagined new expanses of possible forms of mockery are opening up at the expense of ours, very dear to us, it says, but shamefully unorganized /disordered states!
Does this mean that it is quite enough for the investor - as the highest illegal instance in illegal activities that result in illegal moments in the space - to notarize a statement that he assumes responsibility for all eventual losses in personnel and material incurred "during the duration of the use of the object in question" - erected illegally, I must emphasize again - so should we state that there is no flaw in the finished work?
Jokes aside, everything that happened, is happening and will happen in connection with the notorious Lamela "C", represents and will represent, first of all, a hot slap to the state of Montenegro - the proud and glorious homeland of our beloved - and immediately afterwards and gentlemen I will connect, to the Prime Minister, and I'll leave, Minister of Spatial Planning, Urbanism and State Property.
Kudos to Minister Odović for the decisive steps he took in the direction of solving an apparently intractable problem - but, alas, Mr. Odović would have to admit at this moment - first to himself, and immediately afterwards to everyone above him - especially to Mr. Spajić - that the problem of the notorious Lamela "C" is not primarily of a legal-formal nature, but of a systemic nature - and then, with Spajić's blessing (and with the precondition that Mr. Spajić is interested in the issue, which is questionable), he would have to hire imported highly skilled labor (domestic has not been in the workforce for a long time). forms) - in order to start the so-called comprehensive systemic reforms (in which some still believe).
Otherwise...
***
And as for the Spatial Plan of Montenegro until the far, far away year of 2040 and the corresponding Report on Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment - the plan has reached the Draft stage - so Odović is calling us to a Public Debate - and now it's up to us, the citizens of this shamefully disordered/disordered state, to respond and to selflessly contribute to that important matter with our questions, proposals, suggestions, and especially constructive criticism.
In that name, about ten days ago, a public presentation of the Draft PPCG and the corresponding Report was held in Podgorica - precisely in the capital's Assembly building and at an inconvenient time - from 10 a.m. to 13 p.m. Unfortunately, I didn't have the opportunity to enhance the event with my presence because of my earlier commitments - but I did try to get information about the event on the Internet.
I didn't dig up anything of substance - and as for the photos from the event, I was glad to see among the small crowd Vuk Iković, one of the more prominent figures who appear in front of the "Revolution" Movement - otherwise a general practice all-rounder, always ready to contribute constructively on any topic.
"When a householder plans a barn for cattle," he thundered exactly one year ago to Vuča Iković, "he immediately knows how many cows he will keep in that barn and based on that he plans and builds his farm. The competent Ministry is planning Montenegro until 2040, but it does not know how many inhabitants Montenegro has today and how many there will be by 2040".
On this occasion, however, Vuče appeared to Iković to be more reserved - he did not mention the stables or cattle, nor the so-called demographic indicators - but that is why he was interested in whether the Draft Plan provides answers to the question of zones where it is necessary to carry out urban rehabilitation - and where, accordingly, a construction monitor will be introduced - which means that Iković Vuča has definitely broken the pots - because all we know that in the Law on Spatial Planning and Building Construction we have that article 17 - which is also my favorite article and which says, paragraph 5: "The general regulation plan of Montenegro determines, in particular: "... the boundaries of urban rehabilitation zones... .”.
Therefore, urban rehabilitation zones are not decided, says the Law, at the level of the Spatial Plan, but at the level of the famous General Regulation Plan - although, truth be told, in the Spatial Plan there should be some general guidelines regarding the determination of urban rehabilitation zones - some set criteria, for example - as well as guidelines from the rehabilitation process itself.
And as for PGR - I'm afraid that would take us too far - so I wouldn't suggest to my colleague Iković that he go into complex PGR issues on his own - without a reliable guide.
"Is it possible to give a recommendation", Ikovic insisted, despite everything, "what needs to be done in order for wood processing and the food industry to come to life. With this document, can you make a proposal to ban the export of wood pulp?".
Svetlana Jovanovic, the manager of the development of the PP, cut Iković with her gaze as if with a sword and stated that (the expert team she heads) cannot "micro-locationally" (that's the professional term) get down to every problem, but that (they) will strategically determine (if they haven't already, and they probably are). Mrs. Jovanović then reminded the audience that "two-thirds of Montenegro is under protection, so a compromise must be made and something must be sacrificed, but we must do it responsibly" - which, I believe, no one doubts, not even our Ikovič Vuča.
In the end, Mrs. Jovanović made up her mind, in principle, about the problem of illegal construction: "Everything that is illegal should be solved (be careful, he doesn't want to destroy - but to solve - which is encouraging - op.a.). Some are made for profit, some are necessary accommodation. We give the rules here, and let the municipalities solve their problems accordingly (according to the formula: take care of Odović, go to the municipality - op.a.)”. We can arrange for municipalities to define illegal zones, to have them mapped where they are... (in case the municipalities do not know where these so-called illegal zones and that they don't have it mapped - op.a.)” etc.
Is salvation, we ask now, in microlocation mapping...
Bonus video:
