Without adequate regulation - fourteen signatories are now former high-ranking experts in the field of AI in companies AIOpen i DeepMind - they warned that things can take a course that no one wants, that the experiment has gone too far, in any case there is no going back to the old ways, the only question remains is who will be - engineer of the future which certainly comes as a post-human figure, the reality of robotics. In support of how far things have gone, they have written an open letter warning the public, which is entitled: "The right to be warned about advanced artificial intelligence".
Due to the length of the letter, we single out the most important: "These risks range from the further consolidation of already existing inequalities, through manipulation and disinformation, to the loss of control over autonomous AI systems, which could potentially result in human extinction." In general, progress that implies increasing autonomy in the field of AI (artificial intelligence) threatens with regression and decreasing autonomy of people, there is a sphere of perfecting manipulation and disinformation, for now still under the control of the centers that manage everything, but maybe the day is not far when alone - operatives - they will realize that they are running the project, having lost all control over it due to inequality in development. However, the artificial plus intelligently generates a new science that operates autonomously without ethical supervision, and therein lies the danger that is already being realized in a disastrous way for the human race.
Za New York Times, spokeswoman OpenAI, Linzi Held, expected to combine pride and optimism with a dose of risk awareness in her speech, her statement read: “We believe in our scientific approach to addressing risk and agree that rigorous debate is essential, given the importance of this technology. We will continue to work with governments, civil society and other communities around the world."
Under 1): what the corporation as it is OpenAI cooperating with governments means absolutely nothing, as long as it is private, big capital that creates today's policies that they in turn give them cover and legitimacy, 2): the spokeswoman, therefore: believes, is aware of the risks, and understands the necessity of rigorous debate, in which will hear more voices, we assume some - soft and modern theological ones who will come before the Protestant Church, 3): when Linzi talks about continuing cooperation with governments, civil society and other communities around the world, can we as a public know, considering if it is about such a highly developed technology, how has this cooperation been carried out so far?
We have already written how it is An institution for the future left only six months to hear the different voices of scientists, free intellectuals, philosophers, theologians, sociologists, psychologists, who were opposed to each other, on the issue of such an important/crucial matter as the first brain implantation, what is it all about Mask spoke as the Messiah of the 21st century, although this does not bother him in the least to support his supporters Trampa, that is to say: natalists, ultraconservatives, we can also say camouflaged racists (mainly white supermatists), given that the dominant rhetoric of the Republican leader is the anti-immigration narrative, the expulsion of immigrants, all those who have just been impoverished and rushed to the brink of existence as a result of the pernicious foreign policy that led by the US. Therefore, the question is more than clear: to what extent, therefore, is the company itself "Neuralink” and her scientific project in opposition to what is propagated by the politics of Republicans led by Trump?
Let's go back to those who stepped out of the three leading companies such as OpenAI, Google DeepMind i Anthropic, who have previously sent warning messages, stating, among other things: "If we develop an AI system that is significantly more competent than human experts, but pursues goals that conflict with our best interests, the consequences could be catastrophic... The rapid progress of AI could be highly disruptive, changing employment, macroeconomics and power structures.” (Citation dated 2023.)
The goal is a change in the power structure, a turnaround in macroeconomics and certainly the global impoverishment of most countries with otherwise huge territories, because: contrary to general opinion, in the modern world revolution cannot be raised by those who are deprived of everything, the bare-handed people who live on the humanitarian actions of the West and East. The policy of creating dependent countries, debt slavery, as well as pressure through unbearable austerity measures, so isn't that a prelude to - "changing employment", or millions of layoffs so that the country could be saved?
For example, China openly plans to replace workers with cost-effective robots, thereby significantly accelerating economic growth, in which it is currently number one among the powers in terms of an unfathomably accelerated rise, it is going through something that can be recognized as -capitalist catapult. With the rise of automation, Foxon's factory in China's Kunshan region reduced the number of employees from 110.000 to 50.000 thanks to the introduction of robots, and since this happened in 2016, this factory is an introduction to - a jobless future, to a decreasing demand and above all the need for labor. strength, so that those who have the opportunity to explode with work will be considered truly lucky as soon as tomorrow. From, therefore, - precarious workers to precarious lives! (Antonio Negri he made considerable efforts pointing out the collapse of the labor union in Italy, the corruption in the Judiciary, the privatization of state property without any control over this scourge, beyond theory, in practice support was absent, and now there is astonishment and fear due to the fact that right-wing politics returned to the head of Italy.)
And, where did the participatory spirit, the solidarity of socialists, how come guys like Ilon Mask gather around themselves the ultra-rich and the poor, in increasingly noticeable socio-economic differences, and, finally, on whom lies the responsibility, that is: who, in the meantime - fell in love with the position of moral purist and guardian of universal values, apparently without the ability to tackle current problems. And yet, now, at this stage, capitalism is inaugurating an ideology against the reproduction of the human species, those who come (who test our ethics), will be welcomed by a world in which nothing is certain anymore, on the contrary, AI denies us the basic right which is - the right on work, therefore also on life, every form of community, etc., the question - who will manage whom soon answers itself, if we become nothing but biomass, while artificial intelligence advances more and more and becomes more developed in all fields and more effective, then the time ahead is by no means on our side, although it all depends on us. However, what if we have reached this situation in which we find ourselves precisely because everything depends on us? So the artificial intelligence will decide the fate of the human species, which, why should we reject something like that, perhaps the primary desire is to be replaced by its model, which is the product of a successful experiment? Because, when, for example, the spokeswoman OpenAI says - "We believe", the question is missing - which one are we?
Did technoscience, which rests to a large extent on faith in the success of its experiment, buy the possibility of endless failure with enormous capital? Since, if the brain of the first patient rejected the implant, it may not be the case with the second or the tenth, mostly, if we have lost faith in everything, above all in ourselves, we do not lose faith in science, because the time is near when it will show all your power over us!
Bonus video:
