Fears of political revenge killings are growing in America; conflicts are deepening between Israel and Iran (Iran has over 224 victims, most of whom are women and children!), while the end of the war in Ukraine is not in sight. The dynamism of global capitalism causes various forms of crises, since the expansion it achieves depends on it.
Leaving the G7 summit, Donald tramp is on comment Emanuel Macron responded that the French president doesn't know what he's talking about, or deliberately speaks as if he doesn't know what he's talking about. A rhetorical bravura that the first Republican has never used before.
On the sixth day that Israel and Iran are at war (Wednesday, June 17), the US president is still somewhat resisting Israel's call for support in attacking Iranian nuclear facilities, JD Vance is not in favor of that option, therefore, he is on the side of those who do not want the US to be drawn into a new war in the Middle East.
While conservative hawks are in favor of immediate war, Maga isolationists remind Trump of his campaign promise that the US would no longer fight wars abroad. However, as we read, if the first power does not enter the war, it would only prolong it, even though Israel controls the airspace over Iran.
Trump has mostly been saying that he knows where Iran's supreme leader is, but that he won't eliminate him for now. The question is: will the US president, by entering a new war, try to divert attention from the country's internal unrest, which first escalated in Los Angeles?
Although the US should have addressed its internal crisis, to make America a superpower again, to carry out a 'revolution of reason' and enter a golden age of history, so far nothing has come of it. In that sense, what Trump said about Macron applies equally to him: he speaks like someone who doesn't know what he's saying, or he deliberately speaks like someone who doesn't know what he's saying. In any case, his words do not match what he's doing.
Da Netanyahu's The government wants to get rid of what they call the “theological thugs” who run Iran, is also evidenced by the following fact: “The list of targets in Iran hit in the last two days seems to confirm that Israel may be pursuing a broader agenda than simply destroying Tehran’s nuclear program – attacking a police station, the intelligence directorate of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and a state television station while the broadcast was live.”
How to proceed? to the Guardian We can read that, although he considers himself an expert on Iran's internal politics, Netanyahu has never visited Iran, so his "knowledge" is filtered through intelligence briefings, which Iran considers a hostile problem, as well as through the prism of pro-Israeli think tanks.
Making a comparison with knowledge Netanyahu, regarding Iran's internal politics, hasn't the West succeeded in one thing: by allowing public freedoms to be exercised in an extremely 'democratic' manner, it has created the illusion that we are, in fact, free, although that domain only touches on the conformist and commodification level of our lives, about which we know as much as Netanyahu does about “theological bullies”.
For example, in Venice, demonstrators are free to express their opposition to the arrival of Jeff Bezos - “No space for Bezos” - but will the local authorities accept this, given that the multibillionaire (the fourth richest man in the world) intends to organize a wedding unprecedented in recent history? This question touches on a very important matter: are civic moral attitudes more important, or the capital that Bezos will leave to Venice? Or, we can rephrase it without losing any of its meaning: Are our expressions of public freedoms always and only performative??
The modern world in metastasis
It is simply impossible to see an end to the conflicts between (as it has always been defined in the division) - fundamentalist religious fanatics, and enlightened liberal Westerners, while, in the middle, Israel shines with a message in which they are more than explicit: any, therefore even the slightest, questioning of the policies they implement is to be considered covert anti-Semitism.
Explaining why he executed a prostitute who spreads diseases, a fat man who knows only to gorge himself, a greedy lawyer who for money frees a murderer and a thug from slavery, a woman who is dirty on the inside so that she always has to be neat on the outside, a monstrous murderer from Fincher's shooting Seven, John Doe, Detective William Somerset asks a key question: if he considers himself a martyr, there is one contradiction: how is it that he can still enjoy his work?
From the flaming sword to highly sophisticated technological weapons, religious wars over the centuries have only changed the weapons against an immortal enemy, in an endless struggle that, in fact, reveals the true side of our nature. - Author of the book History and Utopia, therefore, has the right: Calling upon God, man committed the darkest deeds!
No less than religious fundamentalism, Western liberalism with its capitalism acts as an extremely colonizing force, the difference is only in rhetoric. So, when we speak and/or rather, it will be inflammatory, we condemn Islamic fundamentalism, however, let us first read these lines (the book Against Double Blackmail - On Refugees, Terrorism, and Other Troubles with Neighbors): - “Let us remember the events in the Yorkshire town of Rotherham, England, where - between 1997 and 2013 - more than 1.400 children were exposed to brutal sexual exploitation.” (Film Primal fear, deals with this terrifying problem in which neglected children, but in Catholic boarding schools, are often subjected to sexual exploitation. All the more so when the Western moralizing, enlightening discourse begins to anathematize the Other, then it is very important to 'peek' into its own no less dark backyard.)
Anti-immigration populists operate in the US, Europe, and Israel alike, but this kind of fundamentalism seems to go unnoticed; it simply seems important to find an eternal enemy in order to justify all external militaristic operations, as well as extremely repressive measures within states. Thus, immigrants are exposed to 1) internal horrific torture by religious authorities (Afghanistan), 2) the genocide to which Palestinians are subjected in the Gaza Strip, 3) persecution, police beatings and slavery within the USA.
Far from any relativization, what the gangs (yes, installed from the West for the sake of complete internal exploitation of natural resources, etc.) do in the Republic of Congo, or until recently in Haiti, are organized, even ritual applications of the most savage cruelty, ranging from gang rape to murder. No less, the local wars in North Africa, are also brutality beyond the comprehension of human reason. But, really, the problem needs to be looked at a little deeper.
Namely, it is most convenient for any colonizing power to have a loyal ally in local gangs, which, as soon as they work in the interests of foreign capital, enable them to carry out all their atrocities. In this sense, it was well noted when it was said that the Palestinians have two enemies - ISIS and Netanyahu, a terrorist organization and the current Israeli government that is literally exterminating them, with, yes, considerable help from the USA.
Bonus video:
