Debalm Lenin

Leninovo The opinion according to which - 'either revolution will prevent war or war will start a revolution' - does not hold true today at all, especially the current global situation denies it, because wars with expansion tendencies, with no end in sight, are taking place without any revolution, that is, it could be said that - war is a revolution accelerated by technoscience, which must be able to find a solution in the meantime to postpone the ever closer and faster approaching end.

Why rule out that World War III is underway, because from ecological disasters, through artificial viruses to humanoid robots on the fronts, it is precisely a revolution, but one that works in the interest of capitalism, that self-reproducing, indestructible Thing that re-establishes itself from everything, ever stronger and more immune, more indestructible, and now it is becoming clearer that capitalism will survive the end because it itself is the end of the world that should be rejected as something that has been overcome, exploited and is now already in the phase of expenditure.

Alain Badju has noticed the division according to which we have, on the one hand, the Western-Japanese model of capital opposed by Russia and China, therefore, this division is made into the one - the Western hegemonic hemisphere in which capital grows under the military but increasingly in crisis NATO alliance, the other side is the Asian-despotic capitalism in which post-totalitarian Russia and communist-cybernetized China achieve the following: through strong, dominant authoritarian states and military force, human resources and vast territory, they slowly but thoroughly penetrate the West, at first through markets and goods, investments, until one moment of a great explosion that will completely eclipse globalism in the Western-liberal order of the society of consumerism, unthought-out and consumption-based freedoms, which pulls them into an ever deeper internal, social crisis, an example is America and camback Republicans, the conservative current as an effort to connect the community within itself, integrate it into some kind of Subject of a new historical page in which the first force would be deglobalized and turned towards itself, with strong isolationism supported by repressive internal control.

The mistake of the orthodox, old leftists is in their unyielding insistence that revolution will prevent war, since radical social changes will be initiated precisely by the globally united great majority, which, in fact, has no other choice but to connect internationally, to impose moral norms on the deregulated market, to carry out, if necessary, civil terror on the authorities, however, one thing is persistently overlooked. Therefore, with the growth of poverty that is being systematically worked on, revolution is, indeed, impossible, only anarchy and civil wars are possible, the struggle of those with nothing and marginalized in every sense against the middle class in which they had placed their hopes even earlier. Marks, but today, it is precisely this class that carries civic consciousness, that is shamefully servile to all authorities and their methods of governance, because a pact was tacitly made, after all, after four and a half years of war in Ukraine, Putin he has not yet started mobilizing Russians from urban areas or anyone from that class that absolutely supports him.

It is true and we agree with this: today, peace is still only desired by the occupiers of foreign territories, America will maintain such a state of peace - which may sound paradoxical - in Venezuela if necessary, even through repression, the same will be the case with those territories that Russia conquered in its attack on Ukraine, such a fate awaits the countries conquered by Israel, tomorrow by China Taiwan, we will see what further aspirations towards the annexation of Greenland by the future American government are, we should not ignore the very real possibility of some form of colonization of Canada, which all says the following: it is not, therefore, only Asian-despotic, totalitarian tyrannical capital that is ruthless, the same is the case with Western hegemonic capital, and over time it will increasingly resort to the extreme application of power without any possibility of political correction of its actions.

Stephen Bannon as a Leninist

Trump's The marketing master who did a lot to ensure that the first man of the first power returned to power for the second time is in the phase of expressing views that are rightly interpreted as 'Leninist', since he advocates a policy of reducing the influence of the technolords with whom the president has surrounded himself, which means that the concentration of power and capital has settled in the Oval Office, from where extremely dangerous, more than risky and even insane moves are made that every day make the world more and more a 'critical space', in Virilio's words, of increasingly real nuclear escalations. Stephen Bannon may be leaning towards Lenin's opinion that the state should be simplified to an apparatus that even a maid could easily manage in an emergency.

The modern post-bourgeoisie, or to be extremely precise - those who do not belong to any class, who are among those 2% who own absolutely everything without a trace, that is: natural resources, smart technology, control over secret experiments conducted in Silicon Valley but no less so in laboratories in Wuhan, who control the arms race, as well as the general public intellect delivered on social platforms, have managed to make the 98% their servants: from gangs that exploit, take the Republic of Congo for example, natural resources for the interests of Western corporations, to biopower that controls institutions, the management of human lives, the population and everyday affairs.

Unlike the impetuous but also impetuous proletarians, mostly driven by positive revolutionary energy, the subject of modernity is an anthropological skeptic who appears at the end of the history of liberal democracy, and so many times played with the cheapest demagoguery, it is expected that he loses interest even in things that roughly change his life, all the more so that he shows indifference to how the wells in the sea from which oil is extracted will affect the aquatic world, or how the new, inadequate and not respecting European ecological standards, mine will affect the city and the residents who live near it. Thus, we have a Nordic noir series that deals with the ancient mythology of these peoples, and the way they use ancient rituals in the fight against neoliberal capitalists who, pursuing only profit, are ready to take away the future of everything, both for future generations of that place and for biodiversity.

Nothing shows the kind of world we live in like the Group of Seven (G7) summit, which will be held in France this year, and the president macro took the opportunity and personally asked for the invitation We are Altman, whose influence in the increasingly influential artificial intelligence is enormous. However, all this ultimately empty declamation about, therefore, the coordination of the global economy, about the impact of reducing the disastrous climate crises, about controlling the rise of AI, about the security and denuclearization of some countries like North Korea, is nothing more than a mere show, what can be described using Stalin's phenomenal phrases - 'If you want something not to be solved, set up a commission.'