The Ministry of Economy in its reacting on the text "And SDT on the trail of Cifidex" continues to dangerously mislead the public, and instead of finally announcing all the contracts regarding "Možura", he repeats the matrix "that the insistence on a fictitious connection between Montenegrin institutions and the criminal offense committed in Malta" continues.
So far, no one has accused the Montenegrin institutions of being connected to the murder of a journalist in Malta, but that they did business with companies that have ties to the main suspect for that crime, as well as that the business of buying and reselling Možura is, to say the least, dubious. ..
They had exactly the same views in the Government of Malta, but until a year ago.
They persistently denied investigations by a network of journalists about the corruption of high-ranking state officials in the deal by which the state-owned "Enemalta" took over wind farms in Montenegro.
Then there were assessments from the European Union that an independent investigation must be conducted, and then the European Parliament announced in a resolution that in the island country in the Mediterranean, there must first be a change of government in order to conduct an independent investigation. After that, the Government also fell, and the investigation is progressing every day...
It is a big mistake to claim that in this case the criminal acts of corruption, money laundering, and the murder of the journalist, who investigated it, were committed only in Malta.
According to the evaluations of Europol and the Maltese prosecutor's office, the main contracts, which were evaluated as corrupt, were signed precisely in Montenegro.
They were signed by a Montenegrin citizen, a close relative of former minister Branimir Gvozdenović.
These are the contracts by which "Cifidex" buys Možura from the consortium "Fersa - Čelebić" in December, and then sells it to "Enemalti" seven days later.
Most of these transactions, including the one with the company of a businessman from Malta, suspected of organizing the murder of a journalist, as announced in the investigation in Malta, were carried out through Montenegro and one of its banks.
In the documentation of the Ministry and the Government, there is an agreement for "Enemalta" to buy Možura, but there is no such agreement for "Cifidex". How is that possible - the Ministry of Economy never answered!
The name of the disputed offshore firm is absent from all available Government working documents. This information, however, was recorded in the Official Gazette, where the entry of "Cifidex" as the owner of Možura was published, and the fact that this company from Seychelles bought Možura can also be found on the Internet register of the Tax Administration. The Special State Prosecutor's Office also reached out to the suspicious company "Cifidex", which announced at the beginning of the week that it was investigating numerous contracts and related transactions...
There are no documents about "Cifidex" only where they should have been - in the Ministry of Economy.
The Ministry of Economy has not yet responded to the request of Demos deputies to provide them with documentation for Možura.
The legal deadline passed at the end of June, and the Ministry is still silent...
While waiting for the SDT's decision, you cannot deny us the right to ask and search for data, but also to suspect that the business surrounding the purchase and subsequent resale of Možura is suspicious of corruption, especially after "Enemalta" publicly admitted various bookings in Malta and in Montenegro.
The European Union has literally blackmailed Malta into completing an independent investigation and revealing all the details or face sanctions.
And Montenegro, I guess, is clear that it will have to finish the investigation in connection with this affair and prove that it was conducted without political and other pressures and obstructions, regardless of which level of government the traces of money led to...
See more:
Download the app and follow the news
FOLLOW US ON

