Regarding the article "Vijesti", published on August 16 under the title "The case of Camgoza is not a done deal - Božović is 'combing' Milović's decision", they reacted yesterday Marko V. Radović i Miloš M. Vuksanović, lawyers of the Turkish citizen Biennial of Camgoza whose extradition to Turkey was refused in January.
We publish their response in full:
"From the moment the decision on non-extradition was made, our client was often mentioned in the public, mainly in a political context, with certain subjects trying to question the legitimacy of this decision. Unfortunately, these activities are also supported by some media, creating a negative atmosphere around our client and putting pressure on the institutions to reconsider or change the decision on his extradition.
Here we would like to emphasize that reviewing or changing the decision of Montenegro on the refusal to extradite Binali Camgoz is legally impossible. The reasons for non-extradition are of a general nature and do not relate to the specific criminal offense for which Turkey is seeking him. These reasons, determined by the decision of the former Minister of Justice on January 22, 2024, permanently prevent the extradition of our client to the Republic of Turkey, regardless of a new possible request.
Any change to this decision would constitute a precedent in the practice of international legal assistance and would bring its maker into the zone of criminal responsibility. As legal representatives of Binali Camgoz, we will use all available legal means to protect our client's rights.
We remind you that the decision not to extradite was made in accordance with European legal standards, including the European Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms, and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The decision is based on irrefutable evidence that has already been made public.
While we understand the importance of good bilateral relations between Montenegro and the Republic of Turkey, we believe that it is a priority for Montenegro to adhere to European legal standards and future membership in the European Union. This is clearly indicated in the Constitution of Montenegro and represents the policy of the current government.
Finally, while respecting the editorial freedom of all media and the responsibility to report on topics of public interest, we simultaneously appeal to the professional obligation of the media to inform the public accurately and impartially.
Further publication of the texts and titles could harm our client by exerting undue pressure on the competent institutions to reconsider or change the already made decision on his non-extradition. Any attempt at such a change would not only violate legal certainty, but would potentially lead to serious legal consequences for those who would participate in it," the lawyers stated in their response.
Bonus video:
