PIO fund: Katnić met the condition for retirement

The prosecutor's council has scheduled a continuation of the session tomorrow at 15 pm, where the agenda will include the termination of office for prosecutors who have fulfilled the conditions for old-age pension.

58607 views 411 reactions 136 comment(s)
Katnić, Photo: Vijesti/Boris Pejović
Katnić, Photo: Vijesti/Boris Pejović
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

The Pension and Disability Insurance Fund (PIO), following the request of the Prosecutor's Council, submitted today the data to the TS Secretariat in which they stated that the chief special prosecutor Milivoje Katnić has (64 years and 8 months of life and 41 years and 4 months of insurance experience), and that he met the requirements for retirement in accordance with Article 17 of the Law on Pension and Disability Insurance.

In the letter from the PIO Fund, which "Vijesti" had access to, it is stated that based on the "Act of the Ministry of Defense, dated June 10, 2021, it was established that Katnić in the period from January 1, 1993 to March 11, 2005 performed training in the Army in the capacity of a professional person and in that period achieved a benefited working experience with the degree of increase 12/15 and 12/16, which is a total of 15 years and 7 months". Based on the updated data in the Civil Registry, the PIO Fund listed nine more plaintiffs on the list of plaintiffs who meet the conditions for exercising the right to an old-age pension.

The plaintiffs Radmila Ćuković (65 years and 3 months of life and 35 years and 10 months of insurance experience), Vesna Jovićević (64 years and 10 months of life and 36 years and 8 months of insurance experience), Suzana Milić (65 years and 2 months of life and 35 years and 11 months of insurance experience), Olivera Ražnatović (64 years of age and 36 years and 6 months of insurance experience), Milica Rmandić (65 years and 3 months of life and 37 years and 8 months of insurance experience).

In the PIO Fund's letter, it is stated that the plaintiff Milivoje Tomčić (65 years and 1 month of life and 40 years and 9 months of insurance experience), Božidarka Gačević (66 years of age and 31 years and 2 months of insurance experience) also acquired the conditions for an old-age pension. , Hajran Kalač (64 years and 7 months of life and 40 years and 1 month of insurance experience) and Feriha Muratović (64 years and 9 months of life and 37 years and 1 month of insurance experience).

In the notice, they noted that the plaintiff's old-age pension - Ljiljana Milić, who will be 2 years old on December 64nd (with 27 years and 6 months of insurance experience), while the plaintiff Snježana Zejnilagić will already have all the conditions for a pension on October 16th of this year (64 years of age and 34 years and 6 months of insurance experience).

The plaintiffs, who are over 60 years old, but do not yet meet the conditions for exercising the right to an old-age pension according to Article 17 of the Law on Pension and Disability Insurance, are Sonja Bošković, Đurđina Nina Ivanović, Ljiljana Lakić, Željko Tomković, Mirko Bulatović, Hasan Lukač, Ljubinka Madžgalj , Nusreta Arapović, Živko Savović, Tatjana Žižić, Vanja Sindić and Luka Martinović.

The prosecutor's council has scheduled a continuation of the session tomorrow at 15 pm, where the agenda will include the termination of office for prosecutors who have fulfilled the conditions for old-age pension.

On Monday, GST sent a letter to Acting VDT Maja Jovanović in which he stated that the intention of the Prosecutor's Council is to state the termination of his mandate, because, as he said, "he has allegedly fulfilled the conditions for retirement".

"With that aim, any prosecutor, including me as the chief special prosecutor, unbearably violates the regulations foreseen for the implementation of procedures regarding the fulfillment of the conditions for a pension. If such a decision is reached, Montenegro will surely go down the path of discrimination, violation of the right to work and violations the independence of the prosecutor's office, which was also chosen by Hungary, but almost ten years ago, and which was decided by the Court of Justice in Luxembourg, as well as the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, and the European Commission also had clear views on this," said Katnić. .

He also explained that the right to the so-called benefited work experience (which experience I achieved due to earlier specific jobs I performed, and which is important, so I remind you, has not yet been determined with certainty), is prescribed for employees, that is, persons who are or have been engaged in particularly demanding and risky occupations and is a form of positive measure by the legislator towards that category of persons, that if they wish, they can exercise their right to an old-age pension earlier than others).

"Such a positive measure, i.e. a right, cannot at the same time constitute an imperative basis for the termination of the employment relationship or the function of the Chief Special Prosecutor, earlier than is the case with other employees, i.e. state prosecutors, whose insurance years are calculated in accordance with the general rules," claims Katnić. in the memo.

Article 18 of the Law stipulates that the age limit for the acquisition of the right to retirement pension established in Article 17, paragraph 1 and 2, is reduced by one year depending on the degree of increase of the insurance period for the insured person, whose insurance period is calculated with increased duration.

1) for every six years spent in a workplace, i.e. a job for which the 12 months effectively spent count as seniority

2) for every five years spent in a workplace, i.e. a job for which the effective 12 months are counted as months of insurance experience:

3) for every four years spent in a workplace, i.e. a job for which the 12 months effectively spent count the insurance experience as 16 months:

4) for every three years spent at the workplace, i.e. a job for which the 12 months effectively spent count the insurance experience as 18 months.

See more: