The acquittal of the Croatian generals dealt a blow to the reputation of the UN, says Vuk Jeremić, who scheduled a public debate in the UN on ad hoc tribunals for April.
The President of the UN General Assembly has scheduled a public debate in the UN General Assembly on April 10, 2013 on the role of international ad hoc criminal tribunals in achieving justice and reconciliation between nations, reports B92.
"The decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Hague Tribunal regarding Operation 'Storm' caused understandable indignation in many parts of the world. It is an indisputable fact that about a quarter of a million Serbs were expelled from their homes in just a few days, and that the court that was established to investigate such misdeeds practically decided that there were neither guilty nor responsible for this act," said Jeremić in his announcement and added:
"From this it could be concluded that the crime did not actually take place, which is in evident contradiction with reality. I believe that a full understanding of the work of the Hague Tribunal and its consequences must be made available to a wide international public, in order to allow history to make the final decision about it. court and that it would never happen anywhere again that a crime would be amnestied and declared a value.
"Let those who agreed that EULEX investigate the trade in organs in Kosovo put their fingers on their foreheads. Gentlemen will conclude that we took them out for ourselves," Jeremic said on Twitter.Twitter
"Let those who agreed to have EULEX investigate the organ trade in Kosovo put their finger on their foreheads. The gentlemen will conclude that we took them out for ourselves," Jeremic said and announced that "they will cause damage to international criminals that they did not expect to happen to them."
He also said that he would do it "no matter what" and "they won't know what hit them".
"That's why I decided to use my powers, and as the elected president of the UN General Assembly, schedule a public debate on the role of international ad hoc criminal tribunals in achieving justice and reconciliation between peoples.
Josipović thanked Gotovina and Markač: You were fighters in war, victims in peace >>>
http://www.vijesti.me/svijet/josipovic-zahvalio-gotovini-markacu-bili-ste-borci-ratu-zrtve-miru-clanak-100660
Bearing in mind that the UN was the founder of such courts, I think it is natural to discuss their effect here, as well as the degree of fulfillment of their original purpose.
My personal opinion is that the decision of the Appeals Chamber of the Hague Tribunal dealt a blow to the reputation of the UN, but I allow the possibility that, as a member of a people whose expulsion from their homes was legalized by this act, I am somewhat subjective on this issue.
The decision of the Appeals Council of the Hague Tribunal dealt a blow to the reputation of the UN, but I allow the possibility that, as a member of a people whose expulsion from their homes was legalized by this act, I am somewhat subjective on this issue
I am firmly convinced that true reconciliation and the turning of a new page in the relations between the warring nations cannot be based on the negation and glorification of crimes, because this essentially represents an incentive for their repetition. That is why I am scheduling the debate, entitled 'The role of international justice in achieving reconciliation', for April 10, 2013, at the United Nations General Assembly in New York," said Jeremic.
Bonus video:
