UN experts: Disproportionate conviction of Assange, he received almost a year in prison for a minor offense

They also expressed concern that since April 11, when he was arrested at the Ecuadorian embassy, ​​Assange has been held in Belmarsh, a high-security prison, as if he had been convicted of a serious crime.
553 views 1 comment(s)
Assange, Photo: Reuters
Assange, Photo: Reuters
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

The conviction of the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, to 50 weeks in prison for violating his conditional release in a British court is "disproportionate", the United Nations (UN) working group on arbitrary detention assessed today.

A group of independent experts said in a statement that they are "deeply concerned" about the decision of the British court, assessing that it is a "disproportionate sentence" that was imposed on Assange.

That group of experts works at the request of the UN Human Rights Council, but does not express itself on behalf of the United Nations.

Assange was sentenced in the UK to 50 weeks in prison for failing to respond to a court summons in 2012, breaching the terms of his parole.

Instead of responding to the summons, the 47-year-old Assange requested asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in June 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he was wanted on allegations of rape and sexual assault.

His lawyers argued that he did not respond to the court because he was "desperate" who feared extradition to the US.

Assange was arrested last month when Ecuador revoked his political asylum after seven years spent in that country's embassy in London.

Experts stated that it was a minor offense for which he received an almost maximum sentence of one year in prison.

They added that Sweden is no longer prosecuting Assange since the investigation against him there was closed in 2017.

They also expressed concern that Assange has been held in Belmarsh, a high-security prison, as if convicted of a serious crime since April 11, when he was arrested at the Ecuadorian embassy.

"This treatment appears to be contrary to the principles of necessity and proportionality provided for by norms related to human rights," the group stated.

Bonus video: