stav

Freeing life

I do not agree that the Government reduces me to a mere salary increase. I am his majesty's citizen. A citizen who does not agree to social decadence
0 comment(s)
euro, money, Photo: Shutterstock
euro, money, Photo: Shutterstock
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.
Ažurirano: 18.08.2014. 07:20h

Belonging to the human race is the only determinant I have ever recognized. I saw all other affiliations, whether social, party, ethnic or religious, as an opportunity to act in them as an individual and to realize myself in those separations. As such, I have always been and remain a minority. Over time, I began to see my attitude as a privilege, and all those collectivities as self-righteous cages in which you are locked up if you agree to be branded. That's my right to disagree. My right to start a revolution in my personal world, my microcosm.

I strongly believe that all changes begin in the same way. They begin with a man waking up one fine morning and deciding to do just one thing that he hadn't done before. For example: to call a neighbor Good day. To just smile at the stupidity. And the most important thing - to look up when something hurts. To say... To do something sometime. To do something for himself, not for others, not for the collectivity, but for himself. It's called a revolution in your personal microcosm. It is the right to disagree.

In the life of every society there are moments of decadence. When social values ​​are equated with social sediment. When society sells prostitution as a moral value. Is there a difference between the publicized case of prostitution in Budva and the local government election in Podgorica? On the one hand, it is the provision of sexual services for money, and on the other hand, the provision of voting services for personal privileges or the privileges of certain collectivities. This coastal service is punishable by law, while this continental one is declared a virtue known as wisdom. It won't be. If I were to dare to lament this comparison, I would say that the Podgorica case is more dangerous for society. Due to the fact that I, as a single voter, am a suffering party behind whose back they provide services. So, we have a triangle in Podgorica.

Excuse me, but I have the right to say that I do not agree to that. Just as I also do not agree that the Prime Minister and his Government treat me with such cynicism and ignorance as an educator. I do not agree that the Government reduces me to a mere salary increase. I am his majesty's citizen. A citizen who does not agree to social decadence, who has raised his eyes and is ready to rebel.

Bonus video:

(Opinions and views published in the "Columns" section are not necessarily the views of the "Vijesti" editorial office.)