Today the world is engaged in the study of a monstrous, insane text. Of almost 1500 pages. The abomination is called the European Declaration of Independence 2083, and the author became famous before his text. Anders Behring Breivik, Norwegian mass murderer. A new chapter in the history of evil. His hateful fixation is the three M's: Muslims, Marxists and multiculturalists... This mix points to a genealogy: fascist, without the rest. Just think how many people around you, in their daily hatred, in their "implicit fascism", have the same or very similar "list of priorities". Or as Daniel Kon Bendit (for the incorrigible 1500-year-old - the legendary Red Danny) stated: "Much of what he said could have come out of the mouth of any right-wing politician." I have to admit that I thought at first - some texts (after all) should not be distributed. Because, if these XNUMX pages of trumpeting by a fascist (inextricably linked to the act of massacre) will ever, in any possible future, ignite a similar evil in another head - then it is really advisable to think about some kind of blocking of the text. Maybe it's a euphemism for censorship, but this situation calls for "necessary censorship".
As I write this, a part of me is reacting violently - one must never, under no circumstances agree to any form of censorship. OK. But - how safe is the usual model - when such a text is equipped with reliably clear comments and clarification of the mechanisms of criminal thinking... Is this even possible? After all, how many times have we all skipped a foreword (or afterword) no matter how necessary or important it seemed. Similar dilemmas have been raised in many countries - and there are still more where you cannot print Mein Kampf - regarding Hitler's book. This text is so stupid that even comments are impossible. This actually makes him even more dangerous. In the end, censorship is pointless - there will always be readers for whom the bizarre generates meaning more easily than any meaningful judgment.
From the passages that we could read, it is clear that he is an uneducated fool, a retard without content, a spiritual rat, but with feelings - loyalty and mission. And that is - a hellish combination. Loyalties, mind now – to your race. Although I don't know how to communicate with race. And especially how to get tasks from her. What do you mean racially? It is a non-opinion. The mission is, consequently, the defense of the race. That vague and non-existent, unstable and phantom fluid from a while ago.
From there to bloody hands there is not much. In addition to all this, the gentleman is postmodernly quotable: in the spirit of the global trend of popularity of pseudo-historical thrillers, there are also the Templars, the "mythical" meeting of the nine in London, and the like... (It seems that he has read Dan Brown.) Also disgustingly cynical - on square. He called out to the frightened youth, dressed as a policeman, and motioned with his hands for them to move towards him, and then he killed them. Despite the horror that this act causes in everyone, those who call him an "icon" and a lone "warrior" have already spoken out. This, even more convincingly, testifies to how sick today's Europe is. A statement that he was aware of the cruelty but felt no guilt would have to be a serious obstacle to the lawyer's attempt to declare him insane. This one is not crazy. He knew exactly and clearly what (and why) he was doing. Like any real fascist, he is just banal, stupid and endlessly ready for evil. Even if I risk being pathetic - there is no greater evil than the ideology that turned this Norwegian monster into a killing machine. And what kind of ideology is that? The problem is that this ideology rests on those premises that a good number of Europeans will accept without thinking - family, tradition, purity of language, religion and similar abominations... So where is the difference between, so to speak, normal love for "family , tradition, nation, language, religion" and that love for those same values that gives rise to murderous fascism? At the price of being misunderstood - there is no such thing as normal love. Any love, for anything, can be dangerous. Only your heart can make it different (valuable, great). And your mind. But, as we said, the rhetoric of the Norwegian killer, this herostrat of our time, is received by many - after all, in their confrontations with Marxism and multiculturalism (and with Muslims), similar statements can be heard here from religious dignitaries of the highest rank, and not only from the marginals from the street... Wasn't this area full of similar monsters twenty years ago, behind which the state stood with all its powers... The chilling Norwegian story confirms that zero tolerance towards all forms of fascism is necessary in modern societies . This is the only way to ensure that the "Norwegian monster" never happens again.
Bonus video:
