Reconstruction

Who about what politicians about reconstruction. One would think that they were talking about the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, and not about Zdravko's cheerful apostolic company.

When local politicians talk about the reconstruction of the government, they all talk about something different. In such a situation, any form of agreement is impossible.

For some, reconstruction should mean the defeat of the current prime minister and his ("expert") concept, for others, reconstruction means above all the survival of this government, for others it is just a way to be on stage... And so on, and so on in a circle.

Therefore, a rational and positive outcome for this society is unlikely.

But, while the government is in the position of "shack neither in heaven nor on earth", the background is revealed, a kind of mosaic of small blackmails, calculations, cajoling between partners, fraud of citizens (in an extended period)...

I'm not sure that's a good way to go. This behavior of politicians calls into question the very idea of ​​change. Now it is quite legitimate for someone to tell you - What changes?

For some, the story of reconstruction may only mean gaining time. Until the frog is cooked.

The discourse of politics is often, in its essence, misleading. When the Church tells you that they are not interested in politics, you know that it means exactly the opposite. When someone swears by Europe, as DPS has done for decades, it is immediately clear to you that they are not interested in Europe. If they were interested, we would already be there. (And therefore, we wouldn't be here. And not being here but there... is missing Marovic, this would be the time for his verbal spectacles.) What they were interested in, in its essence and in all possible forms, was a deeply anti-European practice. This is what brought Montenegrin society to a situation where it fell this low...

It is not easy to build anything but a Potemkin village on such a foundation. And that is not reconstruction, but - deception.

Montenegrin society needs politicians who do not mislead citizens and do not base their actions on public opinion surveys. Because such politicians cannot lead society forward. How many different people do you see around you, how many can you find in the current Montenegrin burlesque? The answer to this question is crucial for the future of Montenegro.

Let's say, from various addresses, the stories about the introduction of religious education in Montenegrin schools do not subside. Does anyone really think that is the solution? And for what would that be a solution, for what problem of this society? Would there then be more civic awareness and courage, more spirituality, do you think people would be more moral? Would Montenegro really be a better place with such a subject in school programs?

One of the metropolitan's refrains is the return of the chapel to Lovćen. Maybe it's also called - reconstruction. I believe that in both cases the metropolitan will be equally successful. After all, it's easy for him - as soon as he is supported by 90 percent of the citizens of Cetinje, as he said. Or he skipped math classes because of religious studies. And history, undoubtedly.

The other day, after thirty years, Somalis got the opportunity to go to the cinema again. In those days without movies, they watched the same movie: a three-decade horror. A small tidbit, you probably missed it, in the overabundance of information from all sides. But, think about it, a space was deprived of such an ordinary and everyday, self-evident thing as a cinema. And for three decades. That's when the civil war started. And once the building was demolished (reconstruction was necessary, of course), because part of the political spectrum in Somalia believes that the bisokop is a source of immorality. And yes, that may be an important detail: as soon as they abolished the cinema, they introduced compulsory religious education...