EDITOR'S ATTITUDE

Plowing by Marko Kovačević

The claim that the journalists of "Vijesti" are in collusion with the other applicants is also the result of a long-standing tango that his side of Montenegrin politics danced with the other, with the common goal of driving the voters of both sides crazy with fake identity disputes, so that they don't think about important, vital issues. things, and gave votes to someone else

50132 views 87 reactions 58 comment(s)
Kovačević, Photo: Svetlana Mandić
Kovačević, Photo: Svetlana Mandić
Disclaimer: The translations are mostly done through AI translator and might not be 100% accurate.

Although the party leader publicly calls him the bright future of the New Serbian Democracy, the impression is that Marko Kovačević pretends not to understand that "Vijesti" journalists are not his party's army of party bots, nor its megaphones like unsigned "journalists" from portals close to his party, but neither those from the opposite "patriotic" sex, who spread lies and hate speech almost every day.

I hope he knows that very well.

There is hope for him and the NSD if in this application he is only pretending that it is impossible for the article in "Vijesti", which was written as a reaction to his inflammatory statements, that it is not the result of a conspiracy or someone's order, nor is it a chase like the ones conducted by numerous people every day the media under the control of his real political role model, the autocrat from our neighboring and brotherly country. Both there and here. However, if he really thinks so, neither he nor the party will get far, if he is really its future.

It suited Kovačević perfectly when "Vijesti" published, for decades, similar, professional articles about the then mayors, heads of state governments, with the reactions of the NGO sector and the opposition, including his and his colleagues, to numerous "fouls" by politicians from the former government like his.

Now as a "liberator" he would scare and control us, just as his predecessors tried for decades, so that we would shut up about his inactions and public attitudes from the 19th century, whether they were criminal acts or not. Do you think he succeeded?

The claim that the journalists of "Vijesti" are in collusion with the other applicants is also the result of a long-standing tango that his side of Montenegrin politics danced with the other, with the common goal of driving the voters of both sides crazy with fake identity disputes, so that they don't think about important, vital issues. things, and gave votes to someone else. They managed it for a long time. The "Dalai Lama" says that he realized that it doesn't work anymore, but Kovačević didn't, or pretends not to. Who knows, some of those statements were not needed.

If she finds anything bad about his ethnic, religious or political affiliation in the texts written by colleague Matijašević, or "inspired" by colleague Kosović (this is unprecedented, because the application does not say which ones), anything that has even a fraction of his chauvinistic statements or actions, (without his colleagues from the other side saying that) here I promise, we will introduce a special column called "the best and most beautiful politician ever, more beautiful and smarter than Vučić" and there we will publish only fairy tales and other eulogies and anecdotes from his vivid biographies.

He says he expects an apology, because the prosecution did not prosecute him for "fixing the clock". "Vijesti" always apologizes publicly when they make a mistake, but we have no reason for him.

Of course, anyone who endangers anyone's safety with threats should be punished, but Kovačević missed the mark with this report against the "Vijesti" journalist.

When the prosecution rejects this foolishness of his, "Vijesti" will file a complaint against him for false reporting on behalf of the reported journalists, so here's a new opportunity for him to whine freely again that our journalists are endangering him because of his ethnic, religious and political affiliation.

Bonus video:

(Opinions and views published in the "Columns" section are not necessarily the views of the "Vijesti" editorial office.)