The General Secretary of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) Ivan Vujović announced today that the party has submitted complaints to the Municipal Election Commissions (MEC) due to the discrepancy between the number of voters who exercised their right to vote, the number of ballots and the number of coupons at several polling stations in Rožaje, Bijelo Polje, and Ulcinj. , Cetinje and Tivat.
"We encountered a huge number of abuses that point to the theft of SDP votes. I have already spoken about this in public and presented clear evidence. This is only part of the reviewed material, and given the short deadlines, we could not cover all cases. The objections refer to pure "legal situations that lead to the repetition of voting at those polling stations. We filed objections at the polling stations in Rožaj, 3-4 stations, one in Bijelo Polje, one in Ulcinj in the center, 3-4 in Cetinje, Tivat," Vujović told "Vijesta" .
He added that according to Article 89, Paragraph 9 of the Law on the Election of Councilors and Members of Parliament, there is an obligation to repeat the election in those cases.
"We also have the practice of the Constitutional Court U-VII No. 4/17. Plus, where the electricity went out and there was visual identification, they did not sign coupons, which is an obligation. Most importantly, a series of slips where SDP and others were circled, which became invalid. Clear intention to damage us. In small places, people report where there is zero in the minutes, and they publicly say that they voted for us," Vujović said.
Vujović said yesterday that they are receiving reports that they were stolen during the counting of votes in the parliamentary elections held on Sunday, June 11, and that they will ask for a recount.
Related Articles
Today, the SDP submitted the verdict of the Constitutional Court in the case of earlier voting in Petnjica, in which it is stated that the electoral committee did not correctly determine the number of voters by not entering the full number in the minutes.
"The Constitutional Court found that the electoral committee did not act in the manner prescribed by the provisions of Article 89, Paragraphs 1-7 of the Law, because it did not correctly determine the number of voters who voted and enter that result into the minutes, which is a prerequisite for its further action. but he only stated in the minutes that the voting took place in complete order, determined the number of votes received by individual lists and that the members of the electoral committee had no objections to the minutes," the Constitutional Court's verdict states.
Bonus video:
